From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-18339-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 11354 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2014 16:58:35 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 18339
Received: (qmail 10630 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2014 16:58:29 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.2
Message-ID: <52DEA513.6030203@necoro.eu>
Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2014 17:49:23 +0100
From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ren=E9_Neumann?= <lists@necoro.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: Results of "How do you read zsh-users?" survey
References: <140121082101.ZM32362@torch.brasslantern.com>
In-Reply-To: <140121082101.ZM32362@torch.brasslantern.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.6
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Am 21.01.2014 17:21, schrieb Bart Schaefer:
> The number of responses hasn't changed much since the weekend, so I'm going
> to unscientifically call it off and report.

To allow a more useful interpretation of the numbers: Could you state
the number of votes?

- René