From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17462 invoked by alias); 11 Oct 2014 21:44:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19236 Received: (qmail 27575 invoked from network); 11 Oct 2014 21:44:48 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=AduIQRnG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=AfPcm9kgNaxddVNJzzs4yQ==:117 a=AfPcm9kgNaxddVNJzzs4yQ==:17 a=sicYhokT53YA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=9GTVjVKn0wqbX3OAIqAA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 Message-id: <5439A54A.9060304@eastlink.ca> Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2014 14:46:50 -0700 From: Ray Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: zsh 5.0.7 References: <54397CC0.9070206@eastlink.ca> <141011131053.ZM28143@torch.brasslantern.com> In-reply-to: <141011131053.ZM28143@torch.brasslantern.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 10/11/2014 01:10 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote: Bart, > Not two copies, note the link count of 2. Two hardlinks to the same file. Ah. I've never paid any attention to hard links before, they aren't on my radar. Thanks. > You didn't do anything wrong; zsh's default install is designed to avoid > stepping on files from the OS that may be under control of a package > manager. > Ok, so what's the approved fix? In this particular install I have no need to keep anything around that's not current, and of course I want all roads to lead to 5.0.7. Should I just fiddle with the pointers? BTW, there doesn't seem to be anything else lying around that's obviously 5.0.6, maybe Debian has it filed some other way. Nice to clean it out if possible but I don't want system upgrades to get all flustered.