From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2626 invoked by alias); 3 Nov 2014 02:19:30 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19318 Received: (qmail 16904 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2014 02:19:29 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=HYUtEE08 c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=WX1zAfUMD62odRRZjfQOeg==:117 a=WX1zAfUMD62odRRZjfQOeg==:17 a=gmhVCtT3eHoA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=iVAXmyUhZY4rRvR4TkAA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Message-id: <5456E6EA.2050806@eastlink.ca> Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 18:22:34 -0800 From: Ray Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.1.2 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Mikael Magnusson , Bart Schaefer , Zsh Users Subject: Re: for loop question References: <5456984A.3020001@eastlink.ca> <20141102213713.GA4412@chaz.gmail.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 11/02/2014 05:53 PM, Mikael Magnusson wrote: > We might want to avoid using obscure mixes of the discouraged > alternate syntax with syntax that depends on short_loops being set, > when helping people who are asking questions about basic syntax. :) It does get a bit overwhelming. However, when I poke at the syntax by asking 'why can't we ...' sorts of questions, I expect to more or less have my fuses blown ;-) Still, any sort of heads up about what is considered proper vs. what is considered discouraged will be most appropriate.