From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21818 invoked by alias); 9 Dec 2014 03:48:44 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19511 Received: (qmail 11668 invoked from network); 9 Dec 2014 03:48:31 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 MIME-version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8BIT Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=AduIQRnG c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=/CF3BNmAB5UH9YmZ2pESLQ==:117 a=/CF3BNmAB5UH9YmZ2pESLQ==:17 a=G8GL833Es-AA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=yYxX-20NB3BdJ9BalpYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 Message-id: <5486710B.2000803@eastlink.ca> Date: Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:48:27 -0800 From: Ray Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 To: =?windows-1252?Q?Lawrence_Vel=E1zquez?= Cc: zsh-users@zsh.org Subject: Re: no_glob not written up in doc? References: <54865B37.4000106@eastlink.ca> <88014DEA-B58E-446B-9FA4-F92B22267A6E@macports.org> In-reply-to: <88014DEA-B58E-446B-9FA4-F92B22267A6E@macports.org> On 12/08/2014 06:50 PM, Lawrence Velázquez wrote: > NO_GLOB isn't really an option. It's the negation of GLOB, which *is* > in that document. Note Section 16.1: The sense of an option name may > be inverted by preceding it with 'no', so 'setopt No_Beep' is > equivalent to 'unsetopt beep'. vq Right you are. I did read about negations of negations and such. And some things negative by default and some things not. Thus noglob is shown as off rather than glob being shown as on, but noglob doesn't really exist anyway. And nomatch is an option but noglob is not and nonomatch is not but nullglob is. Simple, once you get used to it. Seriously, I should have caught that myself, Tx. Lawrence.