From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15547 invoked by alias); 19 Dec 2014 06:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19604 Received: (qmail 11456 invoked from network); 19 Dec 2014 06:45:48 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=T/C1EZ6Q c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=7RdanbHzwoPNWkp1ouN4hg==:117 a=7RdanbHzwoPNWkp1ouN4hg==:17 a=G8GL833Es-AA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=ak3Asw7OyK50CVDHIKoA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Message-id: <5493C998.7080301@eastlink.ca> Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 22:45:44 -0800 From: Ray Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Kurtis Rader , Bart Schaefer Cc: Zsh Users Subject: Re: surprise with echo References: <54937E5B.2020008@eastlink.ca> <141218190653.ZM16331@torch.brasslantern.com> In-reply-to: Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 12/18/2014 08:14 PM, Kurtis Rader wrote: Kurtis, > > Ray, You really do not want to set non-default zsh options related to > emulating the behavior of a different shell. It's ok, I'm just fooling around with stuff I read in Peter and Oliver's book. They recommend 'rc_expand_param', so I'm trying it out. I expect bumps. ... Nonetheless, at a first glance it does appear that the zsh RC_EXPAND_PARAM option behavior is not consistent with the rc shell. Well then! What Kurtis shows happening sure looks friendlier to me. So ...