From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22676 invoked by alias); 20 Dec 2014 03:49:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19618 Received: (qmail 4795 invoked from network); 20 Dec 2014 03:49:07 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=T/C1EZ6Q c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=nXUbkqBeGw4q4gDV/Ctilg==:117 a=nXUbkqBeGw4q4gDV/Ctilg==:17 a=G8GL833Es-AA:10 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=j9rx71_0hLQl5S9gP0kA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 Message-id: <5494F1AD.90008@eastlink.ca> Date: Fri, 19 Dec 2014 19:49:01 -0800 From: Ray Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.2.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: Bart Schaefer , zsh Users Subject: Re: surprise with echo References: <54937E5B.2020008@eastlink.ca> <141218190653.ZM16331@torch.brasslantern.com> <141218215728.ZM28835@torch.brasslantern.com> <5493CC8C.8020704@eastlink.ca> <141219185539.ZM30266@torch.brasslantern.com> In-reply-to: <141219185539.ZM30266@torch.brasslantern.com> Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 12/19/2014 06:55 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote: > On Dec 18, 10:58pm, Ray Andrews wrote: > } > } I love this historical banter. How many guys still with the project > } overlapped with Falstad? Bart of course, anyone else? > > I may be the only one. Paul was my employee for a while immediately > after he graduated college. > > } So vital to have known the mind of the master. > > Chuckle. When zsh was written he was a brilliant but inexperienced > programmer, trying to help his csh-afflicted classmates get used to > Bourne shell scripting. He didn't continue working on zsh for long > after entering the real world. Well well ... so who, really, is/was the master, I asks myself? ... Why did he decide on a new shell vs. working on/with bash? Does he keep in touch? > > Much the same could be said of the man who added the programmable > completion system several years later. >