From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-19687-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 29217 invoked by alias); 4 Jan 2015 03:45:08 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 19687
Received: (qmail 8902 invoked from network); 4 Jan 2015 03:45:08 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=T/C1EZ6Q c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=+SwvCgffRUjIJVDq/BIVHQ==:117 a=+SwvCgffRUjIJVDq/BIVHQ==:17 a=Hpgzp-inWqAA:10
 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=o94Jo87Bdp-lJNo__kkA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
Message-id: <54A8B740.8030309@eastlink.ca>
Date: Sat, 03 Jan 2015 19:45:04 -0800
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.3.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: symlink chain.
References: <549E3A7B.9010209@eastlink.ca>
 <20150102170307.7d2e644a@ntlworld.com> <54A6E6B1.6070201@eastlink.ca>
 <20150102212422.3a761af5@ntlworld.com> <54A7136C.1060102@eastlink.ca>
 <20150102222140.1303a633@ntlworld.com> <54A72CEF.9090102@eastlink.ca>
 <54A740F3.4040902@eastlink.ca> <150102210337.ZM22099@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <54A783C3.3000006@eastlink.ca> <150102231734.ZM22168@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <54A82374.1030208@eastlink.ca> <150103120252.ZM23074@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <54A85B6C.4020103@eastlink.ca> <20150103214204.04a69ab7@ntlworld.com>
 <54A8703B.5080002@eastlink.ca> <150103164145.ZM23772@torch.brasslantern.com>
In-reply-to: <150103164145.ZM23772@torch.brasslantern.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 01/03/2015 04:41 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Jan 3,  2:42pm, Ray Andrews wrote:
> }
> } I'll keep those **argv != '/' tests here, once I figure out how to sneak
> } them past git.
>
> Peter already pushed the one for the -a option, so you should just be able
> to "git pull" that one.
>
Ah, right.  I wasn't sure that would pass muster, since you are 
skeptical of it.  But, for arguments sake, why not do for -m what
has been done for -a?  Mind ... they are rather different things;
-a is the crux of it.