From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 5303 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2015 00:55:36 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19892 Received: (qmail 1059 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2015 00:55:23 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=X+5rdgje c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=2VOmuY/DTsTYmU+TN/zbfg==:117 a=2VOmuY/DTsTYmU+TN/zbfg==:17 a=VNsaWKQvMhEA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=hY8eX_fss97eNFVLP08A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Message-id: <54EA7A77.2000708@eastlink.ca> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 16:55:19 -0800 From: Ray Andrews User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.4.0 MIME-version: 1.0 To: ZyX , "zsh-users@zsh.org" Subject: Re: ANSI bg colour outside of prompt area References: <20150222132310.GA18377@wintermute> <150222111007.ZM18687@torch.brasslantern.com> <54EA6200.1040007@eastlink.ca> <4348921424650217@web10g.yandex.ru> In-reply-to: <4348921424650217@web10g.yandex.ru> Content-type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit On 02/22/2015 04:10 PM, ZyX wrote: > Thus I would say that implementing such option is a pure waste of time. Sure, I expect most will agree with you. But it would be compatible with bash, and I still think more 'correct', since it is more in keeping with ANSI. I'm also guessing that it would be very easy to do, since probably the ZLE code that clears the screen is one line, or very few, anyway. Also, the more I think about it the more I'm sure I'd like the 'bash_color' option for some of my own functions. It certainly is not important however.