From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-20162-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 10312 invoked by alias); 14 Apr 2015 00:29:05 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 20162
Received: (qmail 4279 invoked from network); 14 Apr 2015 00:29:00 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
	autolearn=ham version=3.3.2
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=T/C1EZ6Q c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=fi/b7vffLcBKzpNnUphE9A==:117 a=fi/b7vffLcBKzpNnUphE9A==:17 a=jmtfNK3e4isA:10
 a=N659UExz7-8A:10 a=-frREwV6npswQ0G40DoA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
Message-id: <552C5841.4020909@eastlink.ca>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2015 16:58:57 -0700
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.5.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: `[[ -n $VAR ]]` equal to `[[ $VAR ]]`?
References: <mg78mg$vqb$1@ger.gmane.org>
 <CABx2=D-VTpp3ihAE_A2KCdE3tcPu5RPuB8WJwtv-G=B0QNx0GQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <mg79kr$vqb$2@ger.gmane.org>
 <CABx2=D9Mk01ovQkMyWT_1nh9WdDvcpqmMJAOdka-oEmN8Xe4nw@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABx2=D93rJDoqGHa=9=nGZZU=9oC_vc-0FHE8ZERV9LmxtqRaA@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHYJk3Qj6W=VZ26si0VjhsmS1u9go6mVGpXjDSTLk5knKaEtOg@mail.gmail.com>
 <CABx2=D-Nki9-v1udVT=dbJ5pk9dD_P=aMDkT9=GKZ675sSYFGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <mg7p91$7mp$1@ger.gmane.org> <552BF451.4080701@eastlink.ca>
 <20150413173628.GO95632@isis.sigpipe.cz>
In-reply-to: <20150413173628.GO95632@isis.sigpipe.cz>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 04/13/2015 10:36 AM, Roman Neuhauser wrote:
> # rayandrews@eastlink.ca / 2015-04-13 09:52:33 -0700:
>> My two cents is that each has it's place.  If I'm replying to an email
>> in the most 'general' way--something like "Ok, thanks."--I top post,
> what's the point of sending back the whole thing in such a situation?
>
I never said I'd include the entire previous text, probably only the 
first few lines
for reference.

But Bart will be on our  case for being off topic here ;-)