Re: ls -l *(/)...

[Bernd Steinhauser <linux@bernd-steinhauser.de>]

On 22/06/15 20:30, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Jun 22,  7:59pm, lists@necoro.eu wrote:
> } Subject: Re: ls -l *(/)...
> }
> } > ls */*
> } >
> } > gives
> } >
> } > directory:
> } > file1
> } > file2
> } > file3
> }
> } Well, here, the output is exactly like how you want it (do you have `ls`
> } being some alias?).
>
> I suspect Meino actually has more than one level of directory under the
> current one, despite his original description.  Or he's not executing
> the "ls" at the level of the heirarchy that we think he is.
>
>      print -c */*
I'd go for
     ls **/*(.)

but you're right, it's not clear what he really wants.