On 7/31/15 6:01 PM, Kurtis Rader wrote: > On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Andrew Janke > wrote: > > > I suspect the order of entries in path_helper is determined by > alphabetical ordering of the filenames in /etc/paths.d, where > path_helper locates the files that come after the default system > paths. That "40-" in XQuartz looks like an rcdir-style technique > to enforce ordering, and I think the XQuartz folks know what > they're doing with the OS X system stuff. (This is on 10.9.) > > > That would be fine if it simply appended those directories in that > order to the existing PATH as the man page claims. But it is clearly > using a hash based ordering and ignoring even the apparent ordering > implied by the file names in /etc/paths.d. From my system: > > 14:45 macbook coff ~ ls /etc/paths.d > 40-XQuartzgo > 14:50 macbook coff ~ cat /etc/paths.d/* > /opt/X11/bin > /usr/local/go/bin > 14:52 macbook coff ~ /usr/libexec/path_helper -s > PATH="/usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin:/opt/X11/bin:/usr/local/go/bin:/Users/krader/bin:/Users/krader/sbin:/Users/krader/symlinks:/usr/local/sbin"; > export PATH; > 14:52 macbook coff ~ echo $PATH > /Users/krader/bin:/Users/krader/sbin:/Users/krader/symlinks:/usr/local/bin:/usr/local/go/bin:/usr/local/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/sbin:/bin:/sbin:/opt/X11/bin > That path_helper output doesn't look random or hash based. That looks like: - the system default paths (from /etc/paths) come first, in the order specified in /etc/paths /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/sbin:/sbin: - then the stuff from /etc/paths.d, in filename alphabetical order /opt/X11/bin:/usr/local/go/bin: - then any other item it found in $PATH at the time of its invocation, in the order in which they appeared in $PATH. /Users/krader/bin:/Users/krader/sbin:/Users/krader/symlinks:/usr/local/sbin That lastpart isn't documented in `man path_helper`, but it behaved this way consistently when I was testing it with various $PATH values. (on 10.9) The man page could stand tobe more thorough and clear, but I don't think it's randomly rearranging your path. And the `man path_helper` page does indicate where the default paths come from, though it's buried a few paragraphs down. Prior to reading these directories, default PATH and MANPATH values are obtained from the files /etc/paths and /etc/manpaths respectively. > > One other El Capitan change: the system-supplied zsh (5.0.8) > appears to be compiled with /usr/local/share/zsh/site-functions in > the default $fpath, which was not the case for earlier versions of > OS X. This is probably related to the "rootless" stuff that locks > down /usr outside /usr/local/. > > > Yes, I noticed that as well and should have mentioned it as it causes > zsh running as root to complain about "compinit: insecure files" since > those files are managed by HomeBrew and owned by me. > Computer Security: If it isn't getting in your way you're doing it > wrong :-) > -- > Kurtis Rader > Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank