From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-20529-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 17507 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2015 19:58:53 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 20529
Received: (qmail 3184 invoked from network); 6 Sep 2015 19:58:52 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=X+5rdgje c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=u7jSFDPde++bqsNIHpLwYw==:117 a=u7jSFDPde++bqsNIHpLwYw==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10
 a=8w4l7bpNubY0XST9KiYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
Message-id: <55EC9AF8.9000909@eastlink.ca>
Date: Sun, 06 Sep 2015 12:58:48 -0700
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: zsh 5.1 released [user]
References: <20150906193743.GG3721@sym.noone.org>
In-reply-to: <20150906193743.GG3721@sym.noone.org>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 09/06/2015 12:37 PM, Axel Beckert wrote:
> Can't decide that for you, especially because I'm surely biased as 
> Debian' zsh package maintainer. ;-) 

Well, I'm inclined to stay close to Mother's skirts in this ;-)

Without fooling around with any files, can I do this:

     aptitude install -t unstable zsh
or
     aptitude update -t unstable zsh


This will probably be the one and only time I'd want to be 'ahead' of 
testing so I'd rather not modify anything ... or would that be the road 
to perdition?