From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-20669-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 8483 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2015 15:06:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 20669
Received: (qmail 20125 invoked from network); 30 Sep 2015 15:06:29 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=ham
	autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0
X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=X+5rdgje c=1 sm=1 tr=0
 a=62AtbbSsrca3scplPJj5lw==:117 a=62AtbbSsrca3scplPJj5lw==:17 a=N659UExz7-8A:10
 a=a2Pw0g4eLI6uxHrqYuoA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10
Message-id: <560BFA70.9010402@eastlink.ca>
Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2015 08:06:24 -0700
From: Ray Andrews <rayandrews@eastlink.ca>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Icedove/31.7.0
MIME-version: 1.0
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Subject: Re: wheels within wheels
References: <55FAE223.2080502@eastlink.ca>
 <150917103419.ZM10067@torch.brasslantern.com>
 <150918171441.ZM27212@torch.brasslantern.com> <55FD7982.9030505@eastlink.ca>
 <150919092922.ZM28214@torch.brasslantern.com> <55FDA5D3.9020304@eastlink.ca>
 <150919142243.ZM23634@torch.brasslantern.com> <55FE04AD.1070304@eastlink.ca>
 <150919224120.ZM4736@torch.brasslantern.com> <55FF3F7E.4060906@eastlink.ca>
 <150920211840.ZM31871@torch.brasslantern.com> <5600386E.7060201@eastlink.ca>
 <150921111746.ZM388@torch.brasslantern.com> <56006401.5060902@eastlink.ca>
 <150921201943.ZM707@torch.brasslantern.com> <560B1BE7.8020507@eastlink.ca>
 <CABx2=D_2aXYy1GaZ-d719ZvDQxGD2NwT+KxG7NTwjhGpjkV2OA@mail.gmail.com>
 <150929204047.ZM9646@torch.brasslantern.com> <560B61C5.2080001@eastlink.ca>
 <150930000505.ZM21759@torch.brasslantern.com>
In-reply-to: <150930000505.ZM21759@torch.brasslantern.com>
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit

On 09/30/2015 12:05 AM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> On Sep 29,  9:15pm, Ray Andrews wrote:
> }
> } Each command is past when it's past so that must mean that the address
> } of first foo ... is there ... yes of course there is, the thing is in
> } memory ... just aborts when second foo comes along.
>
> No, the outer foo will happily keep executing until it returns, at
> which point it is garbage-collected.  The old body has merely been
> disconnected from the name.
That's better.  It's not 'abandoned' it just becomes nameless.  Else 
we'd have
orphan lines of code and that's not sanitary.