From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8142 invoked from network); 29 May 2002 06:54:58 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 May 2002 06:54:58 -0000 Received: (qmail 18141 invoked by alias); 29 May 2002 06:54:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5007 Received: (qmail 18130 invoked from network); 29 May 2002 06:54:44 -0000 From: Borsenkow Andrej To: zsh-users@sunsite.auc.dk Subject: RE: Possible bug in completion? Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 10:54:34 +0400 Message-ID: <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F02E89B1E@mowd019a.mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.3416 In-Reply-To: <20020529064011.GA386@idiocy.org> Importance: Normal X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2600.0000 > On Tue, May 28, 2002 at 05:29:49PM -0700, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > On Wed, 29 May 2002, Alan Third wrote: > > > > > [Do a completion and then] if I try and do the same thing again zsh seg > > > faults. > > > > zsh-workers/16776 was a patch for this, I think. > Thanks! :) Which reminds me - there were some number of (completion) fixes recently, some of them I'd like to see in 4.0 - if we are going to see 4.0.5 at all :-) Probably 4.2 would make sense as well. Either we need some defined goals to achieve or just let's release it with all current bells and whistles. -andrej