From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 17705 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 06:18:17 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 21 Jan 2003 06:18:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 7230 invoked by alias); 21 Jan 2003 06:17:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5788 Received: (qmail 7222 invoked from network); 21 Jan 2003 06:17:54 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) From: Borzenkov Andrey To: "'Le Wang'" , "'Zsh users list'" Subject: RE: more interactive menu completion Date: Tue, 21 Jan 2003 09:17:46 +0300 Message-ID: <6134254DE87BD411908B00A0C99B044F03A0B5EB@mowd019a.mow.siemens.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510 In-Reply-To: <20030121015830.14414.qmail@web12302.mail.yahoo.com> X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 Importance: Normal > > > > In the development version, there is also > > incremental mode of menu > > selection, see the docs for the `complist' module > > and for the new > > completion system (under the `menu' style). ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >=20 >=20 > That is very nice. The functionality is exactly what > I had in mind. Once again, I'm very impressed with > Zsh! :) >=20 > One note about the user interface of this > "interactive" menu completion mode: Why have a > 'vi-insert' key binding at all? I don't see any > reason for it. IMHO "interactive" mode should be able > to be toggled on or off permanently (maybe throuth > styles). >=20 You have not read carefully enough :) menu ..... Finally, the two special modes of menu selection, namely interactive mode and incremental search can be pre-selected with this style. By including the word `interactive' in the value, interactive mode will be entered immediately when menu selection is started and the string `search' does the same for incremental search. To select backward incremental search, include the string `search-backward'. It is not default because it is still experimental, it is slow (yes, it = _is_ slow) and it is very different from usual way. I personally found that hitting three times cursor key needs the same time as typing in three characters of next match :)) -andrey