From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-5325-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@sunsite.dk>
Received: (qmail 16781 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2002 16:39:46 -0000
Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90)
  by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 1 Sep 2002 16:39:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 6311 invoked by alias); 1 Sep 2002 16:39:31 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
X-Seq: 5325
Received: (qmail 6300 invoked from network); 1 Sep 2002 16:39:31 -0000
Date: Sun, 1 Sep 2002 12:39:28 -0400
Subject: Re: Why zsh?
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v543)
Cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk
To: Arthur Alinovi <aalinovi@panix.com>
From: "William H. Magill" <magill@mcgillsociety.org>
In-Reply-To: <200208310543.g7V5hZe23399@panix3.panix.com>
Message-Id: <624DC214-BDC9-11D6-B18F-000393768D2C@mcgillsociety.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.543)


On Saturday, August 31, 2002, at 01:43  AM, Arthur Alinovi wrote:
> "zsh is better that tcsh, because..."

zsh supports ksh which is the POSIX standard shell.



T.T.F.N.
William H. Magill
magill@mcgillsociety.org
magill@acm.org