From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12084 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 11:22:16 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 11:22:16 -0000 Received: (qmail 28508 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2004 11:21:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 6986 Received: (qmail 28391 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 11:21:55 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 11:21:55 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [193.109.254.211] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 11:21:53 -0000 X-VirusChecked: Checked X-Env-Sender: okiddle@yahoo.co.uk X-Msg-Ref: server-11.tower-36.messagelabs.com!1073560911!2987755 X-StarScan-Version: 5.1.15; banners=-,-,- Received: (qmail 20468 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2004 11:21:51 -0000 Received: from iris.logica.co.uk (158.234.9.163) by server-11.tower-36.messagelabs.com with SMTP; 8 Jan 2004 11:21:51 -0000 Received: from gmcs3.local ([158.234.142.61]) by iris.logica.co.uk (8.12.3/8.12.3/Debian -4) with ESMTP id i08BLouB026575; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 11:21:51 GMT Received: from gmcs3.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by gmcs3.local (8.11.6/8.11.6/SuSE Linux 0.5) with ESMTP id i08BQTl06974; Thu, 8 Jan 2004 12:26:29 +0100 cc: zsh-users@sunsite.dk X-VirusChecked: Checked X-StarScan-Version: 5.0.7; banners=.,-,- In-reply-to: <20040101013235.GA18846@mail.guild.uwa.edu.au> From: Oliver Kiddle References: <525FE6E8-3BF2-11D8-B757-000A9591EB8C@fastmail.fm> <20040101013235.GA18846@mail.guild.uwa.edu.au> To: James Devenish Subject: Re: zsh 4.1.1 make check errors on OS X 10.3 [was: 10.2] Date: Thu, 08 Jan 2004 12:26:29 +0100 Message-ID: <6972.1073561189@gmcs3.local> On 1 Jan, James Devenish wrote: > The remainder of the errors appear to be related to the "failed to load > module: zsh/zpty" problem. I don't appear to have any such problem under > 10.3.1. Have you got the dlcompat library installed? If you look at Etc/MACHINES it mentions that it is needed. Is dlcompat still needed under 10.3.1? i.e. have you just got dlcompat there as part of something like fink or has Apple added native support for dlopen etc? > PS. I get a lot of warnings about "implicit declaration of function > 'ioctl'" (because sys/ioctl.h is not included) but of course there is no > problem when linking. Also, I note that object files have names like > blah..o instead of blah.o (not that it matters). I think that ..o is intentional somewhere for some reason. Your suggested change for the test's help info sounds sensible. Oliver