From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 11014 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 18:22:07 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.247.90) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 18:22:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 23078 invoked by alias); 22 Jan 2003 18:21:25 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 5801 Received: (qmail 23067 invoked from network); 22 Jan 2003 18:21:24 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO sunsite.dk) (127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 18:21:24 -0000 X-MessageWall-Score: 0 (sunsite.dk) Received: from [80.63.190.14] by sunsite.dk (MessageWall 1.0.8) with SMTP; 22 Jan 2003 18:21:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 3873 invoked by uid 1001); 22 Jan 2003 18:22:21 -0000 Sender: karthy@karthy.karthy.net To: Roman Neuhauser Cc: zsh users , staff@sunsite.dk Subject: Re: qconfirm in front of zsh-users@ References: <20030121152444.GB86853@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> From: Karsten Thygesen Date: 22 Jan 2003 19:22:21 +0100 In-Reply-To: <20030121152444.GB86853@freepuppy.bellavista.cz> Message-ID: <86hec1hwo2.fsf@karthy.karthy.net> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >>>>> "Roman" == Roman Neuhauser writes: Roman> 1) zsh-users@ (that's what we specifically talked about, Roman> could cover -workers@ if needed) will be protected by Roman> qconfirm, which means that non-subscribers will be required to Roman> confirm their posts. Is that really required based on traffic since saturday? Last saturday, we installed Messagewall for all sunsite mails, so the spam/vira level should have dropped to a pretty low level. So is the request still valid? Have you seen a lot spam since saturday? Roman> 2) the ezmlm config will be modified to stop removing Roman> Received: headers from incoming messages (my personal pet Roman> peeve :) Done! Karsten