From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18607 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2001 01:49:59 -0000 Received: from sunsite.dk (130.225.51.30) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 30 Mar 2001 01:49:59 -0000 Received: (qmail 913 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2001 01:49:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@sunsite.dk; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes X-Seq: 3774 Received: (qmail 902 invoked from network); 30 Mar 2001 01:49:45 -0000 Sender: matt.armstrong@openwave.com To: Jeff Shipman Cc: Bart Schaefer , Subject: Re: vim bindings from nowhere References: From: Matt Armstrong Date: 29 Mar 2001 17:48:31 -0800 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: <87k858vxg0.fsf@mortimer.phone.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.0808 (Gnus v5.8.8) Emacs/20.7 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Jeff Shipman writes: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Bart Schaefer wrote: > > If EDITOR or VISUAL contains the substring "vi", then ZLE starts up with > > the vi mode bindings, otherwise it starts up with emacs mode. > > Yes, I suppose that would be it, I do use 'vim' for my > editor and visual, but I do so under both accounts and > only one of my accounts have this problem. > > I do like vim, so that's what I use, but I do not like > zsh's vi keybindings. The account without zle vi mode probably has a 'binkey -e' in its /etc/zshrc (or similar). On that account, try running 'zsh -xl -c exit >& foo'. Then you can open up 'foo' and see who is calling bindkey, if anyone. -- matt