From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gatech.edu (gatech.edu [130.207.244.244]) by werple.mira.net.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id HAA18984 for ; Mon, 26 Jun 1995 07:28:34 +1000 Received: from math (math.skiles.gatech.edu) by gatech.edu with SMTP id AA20743 (5.65c/Gatech-10.0-IDA for ); Sun, 25 Jun 1995 17:25:03 -0400 Received: by math (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA02461; Sun, 25 Jun 1995 17:18:29 -0400 Old-Return-Path: Resent-Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 14:57:40 -0600 Old-Return-Path: Date: Sun, 25 Jun 1995 14:57:40 -0600 Message-Id: <9506252057.AA25960@bjerknes> From: Mark Borges To: gsker@lenti.med.umn.edu Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: numberic brace expansion In-Reply-To: References: Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado X-Attribution: mb Resent-Message-Id: <"G5sMV3.0.Ac.Y7Txl"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/25 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu [ I know this is late, but I've been gone most of June and didn't see any follow-ups posted to zsh-users -- that is, if procmail functioned properly in my absence ] >> Gerald Skerbitz(GS) wrote on Wed, 7 Jun 1995 08:05:45 -0500 (CDT): GS> Richard, GS> Thanks for the patch, but after applying it and recompiling, I GS> find zstrtol Um, this was my (temporary) patch. GS> undefined. I applied the patch to the beta9 distribution and it GS> applied cleanly. Yes, I didn't muck with the configure script. So autoconf most likely detects you have strtol, and decides not to use zstrtol (which the patch implies). So, you need to follow the comment near the beginning of the patch: strtol) and adjusts configure accordingly. I did nothing w.r.t. the configure script, i.e., if configure detects you have strtol, you will have to manually edit config.h and undef the HAVE_STRTOL line: /* Define if you have the strtol function. */ /* #define HAVE_STRTOL 1 */ i.e., check the file `config.h' and make sure the above line is commented out (manually edit it). Let me know if it still doesn't work, and I'll see what I can find. I'm running it under Solaris-2.3/gcc-2.5.8 (similar to your setup) with no problems. -mb-