From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from gatech.edu (gatech.edu [130.207.244.244]) by werple.mira.net.au (8.6.12/8.6.9) with SMTP id EAA26273 for ; Thu, 7 Sep 1995 04:29:57 +1000 Received: from math (math.skiles.gatech.edu) by gatech.edu with SMTP id AA03067 (5.65c/Gatech-10.0-IDA for ); Wed, 6 Sep 1995 14:32:25 -0400 Received: by math (5.x/SMI-SVR4) id AA08787; Wed, 6 Sep 1995 14:27:05 -0400 Old-Return-Path: Resent-Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 12:29:04 -0600 Old-Return-Path: Date: Wed, 6 Sep 1995 12:29:04 -0600 Message-Id: <9509061829.AA06695@charney.cdc.noaa.gov> From: Mark Borges To: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: What do you recommend, wait or install 2.5?? In-Reply-To: <9509052044.AA06362@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> References: <199509050640.IAA04126@orion.pt.hk-r.se> <9509052044.AA06362@redwood.skiles.gatech.edu> Organization: CIRES, University of Colorado X-Attribution: mb Resent-Message-Id: <"XJGOC2.0.092.mVUJm"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/71 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu >> Richard Coleman(rc) wrote on Tue, 05 Sep 1995 16:44:05 -0400: rc> But I can tell you this. When I release the next production rc> version it will be labeled zsh 3.0. [...] rc> But because we are increasing the major version number, I'm rc> determined to make sure that zsh is very stable and robust before rc> we release this production version. But don't `.0' releases have a bad reputation or connotation (rightly or wrongly) as being unstable to the average end-user? Or does that only hold for Microsoft products? :-) -mb-