From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22429 invoked from network); 9 Jan 1997 18:13:52 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 9 Jan 1997 18:13:52 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA04178; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:56:48 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 12:30:11 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <970109093607.ZM9608@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 09:36:07 -0800 In-Reply-To: Pekka Marjola "Re: zsh in shell-mode" (Jan 9, 1:13pm) References: <199701090417.XAA28719@spacely.icd.teradyne.com> <970108220902.ZM8065@candle.brasslantern.com> Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Pekka Marjola , acs@acm.org Subject: Re: zsh in shell-mode Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"GuuQa1.0.It.ZiIro"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/595 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jan 9, 1:13pm, Pekka Marjola wrote: } Subject: Re: zsh in shell-mode } } } Or do people use M-x term? } } Bart> I've never really tried it. I did just now, for a couple of minutes, } Bart> and was not impressed. } } In fact, zsh works reasonably well in term-char-mode. That way I get } zsh's completions and zle. (Set TERM to vt100 :) Ah, yes, it's *much* better with TERM=vt100 rather than TERM=eterm. (Why is that?) I may actually try using it that way today for a bit. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern