From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6767 invoked from network); 5 Mar 1997 17:48:59 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by coral.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 5 Mar 1997 17:48:59 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id MAA23676; Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:33:12 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 12:32:28 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <970305093937.ZM6479@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 5 Mar 1997 09:39:36 -0800 In-Reply-To: Andrej Borsenkow "Re: problem from NeXTStep 3.3 rlogin to SunOS 4.1.4" (Mar 5, 9:47am) References: <9703051554.AA14389@lotto.fishkill.ibm.com> In-Reply-To: (Zoltan T. Hidvegi) "Re: problem from NeXTStep 3.3 rlogin to SunOS 4.1.4" (Mar 5, 10:54am) In-Reply-To: Andrej Borsenkow "Re: problem from NeXTStep 3.3 rlogin to SunOS 4.1.4" (Mar 5, 7:09pm) Reply-To: schaefer@nbn.com X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: borsenkow.msk@sni.de, Zsh users mailing list , (Zoltan T. Hidvegi) Subject: Re: problem from NeXTStep 3.3 rlogin to SunOS 4.1.4 Cc: "Timothy J. Luoma" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"XhZ0S3.0.ik5.iuQ7p"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/753 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Mar 5, 9:47am, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } Subject: Re: problem from NeXTStep 3.3 rlogin to SunOS 4.1.4 } } rlogin SINIX-L -> SINIX-N shows the above problem. It is not always the } whole output lost - sometimes I see only the first line of `ls' output; } sometimes the `CR NL' after prompt is lost On Mar 5, 10:54am, (Zoltan T. Hidvegi) wrote: } Subject: Re: problem from NeXTStep 3.3 rlogin to SunOS 4.1.4 } } Do you use setopt no_flow_control? If yes, did you try to unset it? On Mar 5, 7:09pm, Andrej Borsenkow wrote: } Subject: Re: problem from NeXTStep 3.3 rlogin to SunOS 4.1.4 } } thousand thanks! running with } `unsetopt no_flow_control' } really helps (I havn't set it - it must be on by default). Did you unset this in the local shell before starting rlogin, or in the remote shell afterwards? (I suspect the remote one.) } It is probably still OS bug (happens with rlogin only - telnet runs O.K.), } but as long as workaround exists I don't care. This begins to sound more and more familiar. Is the stty line speed slower on the local terminal where you started rlogin than it is on the remote psuedo-tty? If so, you might try forcing them to be the same to see if that also makes the problem go away. The rlogin processes probably want to use flow control to compensate for the different line speeds. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.nbn.com/people/lantern