From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 567 invoked from network); 17 Apr 1997 22:49:07 -0000 Received: from euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 17 Apr 1997 22:49:07 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by euclid.skiles.gatech.edu (8.7.3/8.7.3) id SAA16040; Thu, 17 Apr 1997 18:43:03 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 18:39:06 -0400 (EDT) From: (Zoltan T. Hidvegi) Message-Id: <9704172241.AA21013@lotto.fishkill.ibm.com> Subject: Re: hpux, vi, and zsh In-Reply-To: from Branson Matheson at "Apr 17, 97 06:07:22 pm" To: branson.matheson@ferginc.com Date: Thu, 17 Apr 1997 18:41:55 -0400 (EDT) Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL31 (25)] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"xe4LI1.0.Zn3.9QgLp"@euclid> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/823 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Branson Matheson wrote: > Strange problem here, Seems that zsh works fine on my hp ... up > until the time that I use vi... then zsh forgets about the up arrow > keys. I have tested this with two version of vi, vi and vile. Does > anyone have any idears? Try echotc te. It may fix it. Someone else had the same problem (or it was you?) and I suggested him to try this, but he did not repored back if it works or not. If echotc te does fix this it means that vi used echotc ti and did not switch back to normal mode. In this case echotc ti will have the same effect with respect to the cursor keys as starting vi. Zoltan