From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9755 invoked from network); 10 Oct 1997 10:15:15 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 10 Oct 1997 10:15:15 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA19607; Fri, 10 Oct 1997 06:06:40 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 06:06:21 -0400 (EDT) From: fk5a005@rrz.uni-hamburg.de Message-Id: <9710101006.AA14946@rzaix42.rrz.uni-hamburg.de> Subject: Re: @ in bindkey -v and control-x ( in bindkey -e To: fk5a005@rrz.uni-hamburg.de Date: Fri, 10 Oct 1997 12:06:49 +0200 (DFT) Cc: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <9710100958.AA18224@rzaix42.rrz.uni-hamburg.de> from "fk5a005@rrz.uni-hamburg.de" at Oct 10, 97 11:58:36 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Resent-Message-ID: <"o6KP42.0.En4.SuVFq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1074 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu thanks peter, for answering the question about the ability to do what i want in 3.1 i still use 3.0 so i have to wait for 3.1 to be released. the other thing that i am missing is control-x ( as i wrote before. sorry for posting my questions again. i thought, they did not reach the list and i am getting so much mail that i missed peters nice answer at first sight! by the way, i am planning to do a german zsh-page which does describe the beauty of the zsh to germans. i hope that will advertize for good. the zsh does not get too much advertizing. i really don't know why that is. but it really, really deserves it! thans to the fine authors and all programmers involved in making unix-life much, much more fun! -- Matthias (this message came from Hamburg/Germany)