From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 12371 invoked from network); 29 Nov 1997 13:58:00 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 29 Nov 1997 13:58:00 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id IAA24434; Sat, 29 Nov 1997 08:49:31 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 08:49:17 -0500 (EST) From: Christopher Croughton Message-Id: <97Nov29.155034gmt+0100.17026@internet01.amc.de> Subject: Re: History key bindings To: schaefer@brasslantern.com (Bart Schaefer) Date: Sat, 29 Nov 1997 14:49:03 +0100 Cc: crough45@amc.de, zsh-users@math.gatech.edu In-Reply-To: <971128091832.ZM2720@candle.brasslantern.com> from "Bart Schaefer" at Nov 28, 97 06:18:32 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 PGP3 *ALPHA*] Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Resent-Message-ID: <"I21aq2.0.Dz5.Sr1Wq"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1165 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Bart Schaefer wrote: > > Hrm. I get the behavior Christopher describes with 3.0.0 and 3.0.1; but > it stops for me as of 3.0.3 (I don't have a 3.0.2 around to try), and I > don't see it in 3.0.4 or 3.0.5. 3.0.0 is in fact what I had, so that sounds like the problem. I've now compiled 3.1.2 which is working beautifully and I'm very happy. Thanks, y'all! (Literally, that was the only thing I've found in zsh which I didn't like. That, for any piece of software more complex than "Hello World", is very unusual...) > } BTW, it was not very easy to compile on the Dec Alpha under OSF/1 > } version 3.2. In Src/Zle/zle_tricky.c line 1551 the parameters to > } yp_all() are not the same (the third parameter is the callback structure > } on OSF1, not a pointer to it as in the code. > > Actually, it's the parameter in the prototype in the header that is wrong, > not the pointer in the zsh code. There's a discussion of this somewhere > in Etc/MACHINES. Indeed there is. However I was uncertain as to which was correct since the man page for ypall on OSF is also incorrect, it gives the prototype without the *. And to think I used to like DEC ... (Now what would make me really deliriously happy would be to find a port of zsh for MSDOS (not Windows or OS/2, straight DOS)...) Chris C