From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 1769 invoked from network); 14 Jun 1998 00:35:59 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 14 Jun 1998 00:35:59 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA23510; Sat, 13 Jun 1998 20:30:08 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 20:28:23 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <980613172913.ZM28487@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 1998 17:29:13 -0700 In-Reply-To: <19980613204012.S3086@math.fu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Guckes "completion control for "man" command" (Jun 13, 8:40pm) References: <19980613204012.S3086@math.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Sven Guckes , zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: completion control for "man" command Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Johan_Sundstr=F6m?= MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"f8Pz12.0.4k5.aanWr"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1613 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jun 13, 8:40pm, Sven Guckes wrote: } Subject: completion control for "man" command } } I wonder - hasn't the completion control for manuals been perfected by now? There were several different compctls for the "man" command posted to zsh-users earlier this year. Check out the mailing list archives at www.zsh.org. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com