From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 4994 invoked from network); 15 Jun 1998 01:39:15 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 15 Jun 1998 01:39:15 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.8.5/8.8.5) id VAA04999; Sun, 14 Jun 1998 21:35:33 -0400 (EDT) Resent-Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 21:35:19 -0400 (EDT) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <980614183609.ZM1865@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Sun, 14 Jun 1998 18:36:09 -0700 In-Reply-To: <19980615021859.B6601@math.fu-berlin.de> Comments: In reply to Sven Guckes "Re: completion control for "man" command" (Jun 15, 2:18am) References: <19980613204012.S3086@math.fu-berlin.de> <19980614015032.30444@picard.franken.de> <19980615021859.B6601@math.fu-berlin.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (5.0.0 30July97) To: Sven Guckes , zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: completion control for "man" command MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"PDsos.0.RD1.Lf7Xr"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1620 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Jun 15, 2:18am, Sven Guckes wrote: } Subject: Re: completion control for "man" command } } But aren't we discussing the zsh here? Shouldn't there be a way to do } the job with the zsh alone? http://www.zsh.org/mla/users-1998-hyper/0060.html -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com