From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9469 invoked from network); 11 Nov 1998 20:48:49 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 11 Nov 1998 20:48:49 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA09558; Wed, 11 Nov 1998 15:47:55 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 15:47:48 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <981111124547.ZM3549@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 1998 12:45:46 -0800 In-Reply-To: <19981111152326.A327@skiff.babafou.eu.org> Comments: In reply to Marc Baudoin "[3.1.5] Bug report" (Nov 11, 3:23pm) References: <19981111152326.A327@skiff.babafou.eu.org> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Marc Baudoin , zsh-users@math.gatech.edu Subject: Re: [3.1.5] Bug report MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by math.gatech.edu id PAA09510 Resent-Message-ID: <"f_Bp12.0.mK2.qVVIs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1935 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Nov 11, 3:23pm, Marc Baudoin wrote: } Subject: [3.1.5] Bug report } } The new zsh seems to have problems with files whose name contains } non ASCII characters: } } skiff:~/tmp> cat généalogie } zsh: command not found: alogie I can reproduce this in both the base 3.1.5 and in my own heavily-patched copy (similar to the patched version PWS made available a few days ago). I can confirm that it does not occur in an equivalently-configured 3.0.5. } Other problem, I've mapped the up and down arrows to the } up-line-or-search and down-line-or-search functions (which I find } quite useful): } } bindkey '^[[B' down-line-or-search } bindkey '^[[A' up-line-or-search } } but the arrow keys then don't work anymore. This is fixed by the patch in zsh-workers/4476, which wasn't included in the base 3.1.5, I presume because it also restores some other 3.0.5 behavior that the archive maintainer doesn't agree with. -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com