From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 2113 invoked from network); 2 Dec 1998 16:45:15 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 2 Dec 1998 16:45:15 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id LAA18327; Wed, 2 Dec 1998 11:38:03 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 11:37:57 -0500 (EST) Message-Id: <9812021621.AA54418@ibmth.df.unipi.it> To: ZShell Users List Subject: Re: counting in "for" loops In-Reply-To: "Thomas Koehler"'s message of "Wed, 02 Dec 1998 17:16:31 NFT." <19981202171631.A22466@willkuere.informatik.uni-wuerzburg.de> Date: Wed, 02 Dec 1998 17:21:28 +0100 From: Peter Stephenson Resent-Message-ID: <"Ai-6b2.0.tT4.bpMPs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/1953 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu Thomas Koehler wrote: > P.S.: Documentation could be better organized ;-) No argument, but the best person to do it is someone who can see what's wrong with it. Those of us zsh-workers who spend more time looking at the source than the documentation are not necessarily in that position. Anyone is very welcome to make suggestions as to what to do. Even if there are people who would like to do it but don't feel their English is up to it (and I know the feeling :-/), any detailed enough suggestions might eventually get acted upon (and that's a promise :-)). -- Peter Stephenson Tel: +39 050 844536 WWW: http://www.ifh.de/~pws/ Dipartimento di Fisica, Via Buonarroti 2, 56127 Pisa, Italy