From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 16891 invoked from network); 18 Dec 1998 09:57:27 -0000 Received: from math.gatech.edu (list@130.207.146.50) by ns1.primenet.com.au with SMTP; 18 Dec 1998 09:57:27 -0000 Received: (from list@localhost) by math.gatech.edu (8.9.1/8.9.1) id EAA26860; Fri, 18 Dec 1998 04:56:07 -0500 (EST) Resent-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 04:56:04 -0500 (EST) From: "Bart Schaefer" Message-Id: <981218015405.ZM27449@candle.brasslantern.com> Date: Fri, 18 Dec 1998 01:54:05 -0800 In-Reply-To: Comments: In reply to Didier Verna "[Q] A mystery (at least for me ...)" (Dec 18, 9:44am) References: X-Mailer: Z-Mail (4.0b.820 20aug96) To: Didier Verna , Zsh List Subject: Re: [Q] A mystery (at least for me ...) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Resent-Message-ID: <"VZ3WO3.0.HZ6.qQYUs"@math> Resent-From: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Mailing-List: archive/latest/2000 X-Loop: zsh-users@math.gatech.edu X-Loop: zsh-workers@math.gatech.edu Precedence: list Resent-Sender: zsh-workers-request@math.gatech.edu On Dec 18, 9:44am, Didier Verna wrote: } Subject: [Q] A mystery (at least for me ...) } } verna(pts/6) 145 % if echo toto | grep `hostname` ; then echo SUCCESS ; fi } SUCCESS } } Is it a known bug in this version,or am I missing something ? It's a known bug; patch is in zsh-workers article number 4397 (I believe). -- Bart Schaefer Brass Lantern Enterprises http://www.well.com/user/barts http://www.brasslantern.com