From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9590 invoked by alias); 7 Jun 2010 16:51:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 15097 Received: (qmail 12144 invoked from network); 7 Jun 2010 16:51:42 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 74.125.82.171 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=YIkvBTl89jSo9N6FevIVAMF4RANySrWsfxf74H1gk7g=; b=rpa3iconArKF0oDmBuo8G2ghqnYQOQoyaE9ZxjaH7bmTbUKV+l6kK7dMhI2rrO33kA +bY91HRolAT21LYetqHARjoKLx/TmRziVgJTAnjz0oopTqHzWiEIcwCctJJZHTUX8RuU ylBnZl2IeF4GcHLna5xezYrLw7zmsFEtuz04E= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=MvmZyqti+/rHDz6hIbc/Ia4U5neSXKnB7ZmiDxq04AQ2GJ7s6uXOQq/BuITcCLlnSG R6XhG1o4GhQUbOEmeo32W4eUG79LtuTUvsU5mDZyZ+TUm2cwu0rQN9amFp80qnPrnLz2 UAz9n8ej3hja++3TBuDMtuvy/RPJolffE1044= MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20100605192316.GB26738@a-oben.org> References: <20100605192316.GB26738@a-oben.org> Date: Mon, 7 Jun 2010 18:44:19 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Assorted questions From: Richard Hartmann To: Simon Friedberger Cc: zsh-users@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, Jun 5, 2010 at 21:23, Simon Friedberger wrot= e: > a) accept-and-hold seems to be the same as ^p Yes, but now it's only one key press. You can't (easily) script a ^p. > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0seem to be the sam= e as ^r ^r is realized with the functions you mention. Not having them means not having ^r. > I know that there is a subtle difference but I don't see > how it matters in practice. If you see the subtle differences, you know why there are different versions. Just pick the one which you like best. > 4. =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0I would like to have some history magic. It would = be nice if > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0^p/^n (or up/down) just switched through the l= ocal history but > =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0^r/^s searched through all history entries. I would consider this useful, as well. > Alright, that's all for now. heh Unless you are Swiss (they are allowed, by law, to append "oder" to every sentence ;), appending "lol", "heh" or similar is annoying to most people. You are, of course, entitled to your own style, but generally speaking, I have found that seemingly little things like that can make a difference. Point in case, I almost did not send this reply due to the "heh". It might seem petty, but at least I am being honest. _And_ I took the time to explain it in depth. Richard