From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-15861-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 958 invoked by alias); 11 Mar 2011 12:06:22 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 15861
Received: (qmail 24689 invoked from network); 11 Mar 2011 12:06:20 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.220.171 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date
         :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=mKXpW3xfpowaxNrswy+As5f/nhAVy5YPPxW0aFdpMgU=;
        b=ZUvI9VC3dR/K2IL7/ts609OjBIYrwJsps2P7FeDsWjpi4aRM3wrDr/DvBLjuZUxzdX
         Rd5QeBmeS//NmKaGcRxXttLTa77DGL/5ovwyX+Tbc9FSozazvSDRktUzXLwuPfcXzvtm
         DNseZPyJ8AjvySnf7LQ9Z5/R1jl9xPrMLFOks=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type;
        b=wA/EkJQidShT8+TOBWbKF/RSPGBZr1B6tLBdB18yZnPwbrH8MHZKsMRWm5yikagG2z
         YA8OZ7jIV2FhA8GuEZ4zlwkKINhMLgbDfq8Hup2LVrLhr+pdwBNrghHcSyHdPS/jN6T3
         6EK4OoU7bPNF3upAb1/yXGeNmlYUA0bJOUW+I=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110311104402.6a411b10@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
References: <AANLkTin+cCxFRYtwZXGSUWyLjfe7NV-eDx1mcS9sSau0@mail.gmail.com>
	<20110311104402.6a411b10@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri>
Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 13:06:13 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTimMbxVwGr+HUh9JcPueOGNzcaVgSn2+b58jEgxw@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: possibly useful zsh_directory_name implementation
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com>
Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 11 March 2011 11:44, Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:06:45 +0100
> Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com> wrote:
>> function zsh_directory_name () {
>>...
>> }
>>
>> With this, /home/mikachu/some/directory/somewhere% cd ~[/some], will
>> take you to /home/mikachu/some/, and cd ~[.foo] will take you to foo/
>> in whatever parent directory has a subdirectory foo, for example it
>> could be /home/foo/.
>
> I've been meaning to add a zsh_directory_name hook, so you can have
> multiple functions implementing this and the function here would
> interact nicely with other functions that implemented naming without the
> "/" or "." at the start.  However, I need to think about the
> consequences --- it's more complicated than the existing hooks.

If you don't have a prefix, how do you specify which of the functions
should handle the argument?

-- 
Mikael Magnusson