On Thu, Feb 15, 2024, at 8:53 PM, Bart Schaefer wrote:
> If you want command substitution without word splitting, then in
> whatever the next version ends up being called you have
>    ${ command }
> to do that for you

Is it also the case that *${ command}* runs in the current shell rather
than a subshell and can therefore have side effects (if it's a
function/builtin, of course)? I seem to recall seeing that syntax used that
way before, but it may have been in a different shell.

On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 1:03 PM Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>
wrote:

> On Thu, Feb 15, 2024 at 8:55 PM Lawrence Velázquez <larryv@zsh.org> wrote:
> >
> > +  Unless enclosed in double quotes, the expansion of mytt($(command)) is
> > +  split on mytt(IFS).  In contrast, and contrary to bash and ksh,
> unquoted
> > +  mytt(${ command }) and its variants are not split unless the
> > +  mytt(SH_WORD_SPLIT) option is set.
>
> That's not quite accurate, though.
>
> % print -l ${|reply| reply=(a b c)}
> a
> b
> c
>
> It's only ${| REPLY=...} and ${ command } that always behave like scalars.
>
> Even ${| REPLY=(a b c)} behaves like a scalar (joins the array), which
> I suppose is also worth mentioning.  Will consider wording over the
> weekend when I have more time.
>
>

-- 
Mark J. Reed <markjreed@gmail.com>