From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3674 invoked by alias); 18 Dec 2016 23:03:17 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 22232 Received: (qmail 14320 invoked from network); 18 Dec 2016 23:03:17 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-vk0-f53.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.99.2/21882. spamassassin: 3.4.1. Clear:RC:0(209.85.213.53):SA:0(-0.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.053101 secs); 18 Dec 2016 23:03:17 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.1 (2015-04-28) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL,SPF_PASS, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.1 X-Envelope-From: plalloni@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.213.53 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TqI7fVbIR0nohFnadH/VRQokM8r0hbL749EUL+SMpO8=; b=GKQy/IkBY6ZR0iNsBXJ5EtjKvMEOGG9bKjGZIMOgpIGFEPe0cmLOJ91Ok8JlpHNAC0 5Z0KmtvvvrmzlQBdts+9pFFWa1ZOLI9o/rFoTtk3on1XhKFy1q6fAmXO9ib7MRkPuc9J ek2fNYQ1uucMIzxGGWH2URA+NlQI67ZVIcOglhcxp1jXLjzYNf4YmNyH3GyzcXu8E6hM LQM41XnfX2I78fQ9qTzFTjznoXbVZ1E1Lbb2vHq85S8tb9n6KTKXUDvk/88LOrTjbRMH Xj5cFvPt8l0ZS6LE40xyYGdd+WP2vrTdpEai6nzAVNwQ6in8l0cl85M8ony+V1rObUvm fU2Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=TqI7fVbIR0nohFnadH/VRQokM8r0hbL749EUL+SMpO8=; b=Hnjj50Zy5HGpf3sNJeN1UvMLqeP/Jfh6wK5qVyZn5aobbq7+EBLgQJhLy9Vr0Qj6jX 2FzHATLDnZxJPg8Z86d5gyEsqLsTFcC9VQ7FoXo9vUyFUkOsnxJRj+3dyo4O39H/08yZ ys+UxqIPA0KwdBErTU47fW1h/QYknD/UmBn/Z+y2TvoDXfoJ8YkF4oisZwTp+mvymgfc TwjJ1Bs3C1rnrSGZsKeIYiOs9d+pzDawI8WZWGNy2V1vKSwX1Bed/zLMOe4XvApYJjw4 pu9khCfS8nDHXREqY2q+oqabhkWX6nP/DA5BPo/wrR7J9QUmV1NrgnMRUx7O2NcpcyDJ m8rQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AIkVDXJfdHXJ3BPH6hpJEzt8OoT0LLdhGoBHvPAq0ZVFAee7zQOaRCdSXPXy1isPBZY0fxAZNwr8JplIl2xhqQ== X-Received: by 10.31.134.77 with SMTP id i74mr5348645vkd.57.1482102189405; Sun, 18 Dec 2016 15:03:09 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 From: Pablo Lalloni Date: Sun, 18 Dec 2016 20:02:29 -0300 Message-ID: Subject: Apparent inconsistency in f/z expansion flags behavior To: zsh-users@zsh.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114115b6853ce80543f6ce41 --001a114115b6853ce80543f6ce41 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello there! I'm seeing an unexpected (to me) difference in the behavior of these flags. Say you do something like: words=(${(z)$(