From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18046 invoked by alias); 23 Feb 2015 04:14:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19903 Received: (qmail 17723 invoked from network); 23 Feb 2015 04:14:14 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=xKA4qd0fTNd3E5UzS9xaE3G2wK1Pomd4cDnfel3msJg=; b=hf7jrqxEQW/0gW7OaoFUbM16yFaqHoWreiFdfsiU4GGv78WiUZ4Vr20r08OJ1h8FLC VzomHdtM6Qvmp5Nd8IrmH/CdA2eJChpyj9CRpXDJV+Pn8o72Ywybmie6vfuBOQUikf5g QRLJfmRfF8DDReiFsQjV79IoE7BdeUDaBX1CFhCn6DR0eOLl4aOXaZH1zYJlJt86kDRT LhgfRT8I3T79EVvkjlQLhy/raBMWNS8EFvUViRrSodQ1VS01NtStSZT7+GkCE6VSiUIQ EIoGQ0H25jTfRx4V/tdogxTNCxCvE2CviHAUYvpRtBa9Tm2ayi5LmSUa8vFyk1XIDpO5 Tokg== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlZ8AL8I8YoRs0gN/tf7V8age9z+yFv2uP4qcEWs8EcB0AL8BOaWP8oQUryuTsQgsSuiicA MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.152.43.228 with SMTP id z4mr7848668lal.111.1424664852323; Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:14:12 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54EAA154.1080602@eastlink.ca> References: <20150222132310.GA18377@wintermute> <150222111007.ZM18687@torch.brasslantern.com> <54EA6200.1040007@eastlink.ca> <4348921424650217@web10g.yandex.ru> <150222171418.ZM19031@torch.brasslantern.com> <54EAA154.1080602@eastlink.ca> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 20:14:12 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: ANSI bg colour outside of prompt area From: Kurtis Rader To: Ray Andrews Cc: Zsh Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11c2280c7271a9050fb9a294 --001a11c2280c7271a9050fb9a294 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Sun, Feb 22, 2015 at 7:41 PM, Ray Andrews wrote: > I have walked to school uphill both ways through--ok, it was only two feet > of snow, but it *was* uphill both ways. No, it could not have been uphill both ways. That's the point of the aphorism "I walked uphill both ways". In our reality there could only be a net increase in elevation in one direction. When someone claims to have "walked uphill both ways" they are exaggerating, usually for ironic effect. When you say "it *was* uphill both ways" you're implying it was literally true. Which is impossible. -- Kurtis Rader Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank --001a11c2280c7271a9050fb9a294--