From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22177 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2014 16:47:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19150 Received: (qmail 15775 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2014 16:47:44 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=mAZuLuSPnGrzIvS4TCm/ooEHPqIMY6oQ/NPqmE2D3/E=; b=EY9/cXQux/MdeoyY1toSXcWWbgIM/vF7qc7rbFgCcncn5/7iXJL3QrSIRS0XXmwrVT ybpDHx1fsPv/gvEmaMUWPGeJMYkOdkrzJfPzGl55F9oz85DRr0ezWPh/J+pW7H9q91qw /H2bksEIVaBlOpQf8BX+t9tL2lWUmqC0dDIjlFKun9A7uzzyrShyRFMkiPJaT1KJW1bK Aumvt260/YA23l48PFYAFNC/5CkbkTDW1hVkxVCnS3SPjO3xTKcpd8iF6aRiFhQ0wzQS juqV6khaiKdCshJnDqF6Ge4wZagH+LrGOHv0a0fzvM+A0EKo8RNk9t+LKNs4HqQ1nxvq VJ6w== X-Received: by 10.181.13.105 with SMTP id ex9mr40475645wid.58.1411663334761; Thu, 25 Sep 2014 09:42:14 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1B204EC0-006C-47D9-80F3-007562954A8D@ucsc.edu> References: <1B204EC0-006C-47D9-80F3-007562954A8D@ucsc.edu> From: =?UTF-8?B?SsOpcsOpbWllIFJvcXVldA==?= Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2014 18:41:59 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Does the bash bug have a zsh counterpart? To: "William G. Scott" Cc: Zsh Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, 2014-09-25 18:35 GMT+02:00 William G. Scott : > Does any version of zsh have the same issue as bash, reported eg at > > None that we're aware of. See threads : http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2014/msg01016.html http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2014/msg01033.html Best regards, --=20 J=C3=A9r=C3=A9mie