zsh-users
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
* Inconsistent behavior with comparisons and recursive glob patterns
@ 2024-04-30  8:14 Alan Wagner-Krankel
  2024-04-30 14:11 ` Eric Cook
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Alan Wagner-Krankel @ 2024-04-30  8:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Zsh Users

The results of these conditional expressions using recursive glob
operators were unexpectedly different:

> [[ f0 = **/f? ]] && print true || print false
false
> setopt extendedglob
> [[ f0 = (*/)#f? ]] && print true || print false
true

Since **/ is a shorthand version of (*/)#, it seems like they both
should have returned 'true'. The comparisons behave the same when
there is at least one directory in the path:

> [[ d1/f1 = **/f? ]] && print true || print false
true
> setopt extendedglob
> [[ d1/f1 = (*/)#f? ]] && print true || print false
true

I came across this because it affects the behavior of zmv, via a test
that filters filenames (line 254 in zsh5.9). An example:

> mkdir d1 d1/d2
> touch f0 d1/f1 d1/d2/f2
> print -rl -- **/f?
d1/d2/f2
d1/f1
f0
> autoload zmv
> zmv -n '**/f?' '$f.txt'
mv -- d1/d2/f2 d1/d2/f2.txt
mv -- d1/f1 d1/f1.txt
> zmv -n '(*/)#f?' '$f.txt'
mv -- d1/d2/f2 d1/d2/f2.txt
mv -- d1/f1 d1/f1.txt
mv -- f0 f0.txt

I think both zmv calls should have attempted to update the 'f0' file
in the base directory. Am I missing something?

Thanks,
Awk


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-04-30 18:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-04-30  8:14 Inconsistent behavior with comparisons and recursive glob patterns Alan Wagner-Krankel
2024-04-30 14:11 ` Eric Cook
2024-04-30 18:15   ` Bart Schaefer

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.vuxu.org/mirror/zsh/

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).