From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22066 invoked by alias); 8 Jan 2015 06:03:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19713 Received: (qmail 7524 invoked from network); 8 Jan 2015 06:03:38 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=2vWKWm2Anx15wGqwVuA7n+KzKtuYgUM0WMImF1pfj4o=; b=ePFtPgSKQDjYojFeVn3YPH8VCLLuZ1bx54fWUovhO8MV6DrpUYksj1s9aN+SYUjmXn j1+DeHOzSfIzfYusLRhAHdHp1jrl+xvLlKOXy42jS5O/Ct0L8Wun8k1FA9alOBqlz9S3 jse4j8uhtIyAeVhoidnhG3vSUyxH5RkIpDheiZrDNQ23+jSiZaHz+EMlKpODJgsJsiST +9ioBl45UccCOA/0hJ7kUbyN5hm9P0H0TXrJm9C1IK7LZPrG+2TfPqzMuRJ3opkfdfN3 OLf1RgvDfuOrdr6nNxefJNJ6h9JglYLqUCBvde4Jj0UNdEfDKB0ogk50ThDGdTdzRyIm 37Ug== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnaMFxr0UR0yEITCo7kD2oqIrmcxRDUNf728cr+rZH5Ux2dxsBXWcpm8U90iaxMUw0eExXv MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.200.234 with SMTP id jv10mr15332027wjc.110.1420697016211; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 22:03:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150108011516.GA10773@xvii.vinc17.org> References: <30453.1418258082@thecus.kiddle.eu> <5488F0AC.2040901@eastlink.ca> <141210214454.ZM12261@torch.brasslantern.com> <5489C8F4.8030703@eastlink.ca> <141211092824.ZM13349@torch.brasslantern.com> <5489F1BC.5000900@eastlink.ca> <20150107150109.GA14088@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <20150108004323.GA7954@xvii.vinc17.org> <1305941420678639@web16h.yandex.ru> <20150108011516.GA10773@xvii.vinc17.org> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 22:03:36 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: completion From: Bart Schaefer To: "zsh-users@zsh.org" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 5:15 PM, Vincent Lefevre wrote: > On 2015-01-08 03:57:19 +0300, ZyX wrote: >> I am wondering what happens if completed command contains colon. > > I was condering the same thing. Not sure whether this happens in > practice, but Debian maintainer scripts contain a colon in their > name. It would only matter if one of the substrings of the command name matched one of the substrings of the style definition that was *not* a wildcard of some kind. In that case a more stringent style definition would be needed if by some chance the style name were also valid in that same context.