From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21636 invoked by alias); 2 Mar 2015 18:52:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19958 Received: (qmail 21022 invoked from network); 2 Mar 2015 18:51:51 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=mN5ofCGyKbmvvmmyRWbN2XfiNN1feHieAH9k93SR5hQ=; b=TmqwEfOmFRKthqo2NQFqZ9LRMBDGk+2v711Ag+PXkT+/ZrtKwEi1BU2D90k6ic3bJp q5GVeAoidK3wNVB29k7wrvz7D3QCSTowWvZAaQA/JtMuEH6D8U5VRTnL00jEo8GR1MdG W5RWjdZzUf7tZzL7SnSyndByS4dOa+QiXO2jbG8rficok7erugNw6RtjTFvoF7z99h4a pf1VznldV90O3zffCt3zN+AoVUMiUUkKoE8Hfk2I3x6hOiG36lsXVOq+pjRU9GMZwJOW 2GIfrEl4c6adVS2DuPvPQW4tjlc59N6YD9r+eLeC7+avivqdYyuZTjVH36CW3iMTxwLv SNoQ== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk9YHWdjigxzcfhvp4vCKswt7CUWIIk0Ucm3bqNvzW1phjjMjBjIWZNTVTkDqlDU3KP9RbR MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.185.68 with SMTP id fa4mr59875497wjc.111.1425322308906; Mon, 02 Mar 2015 10:51:48 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54F4A003.5080000@eastlink.ca> References: <54F33934.2070607@eastlink.ca> <13666281425228233@web7o.yandex.ru> <54F345D3.9010204@eastlink.ca> <20150302022754.GA7449@xvii.vinc17.org> <150302005440.ZM16546@torch.brasslantern.com> <20150302103156.GB6869@xvii.vinc17.org> <150302084958.ZM17306@torch.brasslantern.com> <54F4A003.5080000@eastlink.ca> Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 10:51:48 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: grammar triviality with '&&' From: Bart Schaefer To: Zsh Users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bacb11ee9cb99051052b5d6 --047d7bacb11ee9cb99051052b5d6 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Mar 2, 2015 10:09 AM, "Ray Andrews" wrote: > > My thinking is (surprise!) C-ish--the newline should be irrelevant. (I should probably recommend at this point that you never try to take up programming in Python.) > Just as one can end a line with && so should one be able to begin a line the same way, same logic. I don't know if anyone has bothered to notice this, but as long as all of your conditions are testable with [[ ]], the newlines are not significant inside that construct. --047d7bacb11ee9cb99051052b5d6--