From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 25516 invoked by alias); 3 Dec 2014 21:14:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19488 Received: (qmail 2040 invoked from network); 3 Dec 2014 21:14:12 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=s7jdNDuyTzKs8VCf0ivjWuHggp2f0aJLAd2cUEUR9qU=; b=adQF59yiWTbZsIj/cieFsRHbrGoukj1Ne9Xy5+kayvErLJ/PtLSdpsLJ1tJekbsWWl 1FbMKkgqZKyxIO177qqCE8Ep3u0HkJhcYSFCD56prv1rx0tLdx8nh7GnA8M16Y+y6MO9 7LtiLIycwodSPoLmDogtSp2gKHz0a16aJd7ABwM4QxB1JDmhiV4GKBS5MKCXLu5j+8+j 9MJnMqqWv95p/F9Cfoky5WJhXMgXQlhIEOS0QZ9Q/CWYmOji0WAgxIzbp156uBhA3Tl7 5RX2vL4NNbj15EgiU9E1wZ6n/Vpz789P4dgm0JXJzm7pZJ76VNc0szLD1kmhbq6iqXou bcNA== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQnZMu0s26c0W/h18TqVmd44FNFWe0F8N8Y/rS9fiKwRaZ0X36ytSTpSO5sd7GH80tdUC2Ki MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.194.3.2 with SMTP id 2mr10351631wjy.89.1417641249842; Wed, 03 Dec 2014 13:14:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <547F441E.6060606@eastlink.ca> References: <547E568C.6070607@eastlink.ca> <141202190200.ZM31930@torch.brasslantern.com> <547E9158.6050103@eastlink.ca> <9CD0DDE8-21AB-4EA3-A69F-9B338ECC83F1@macports.org> <547F385B.3070405@eastlink.ca> <20141203164353.GO23965@isis.sigpipe.cz> <547F441E.6060606@eastlink.ca> Date: Wed, 3 Dec 2014 13:14:09 -0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: triviality with prompts From: Bart Schaefer To: Ray Andrews Cc: Roman Neuhauser , =?UTF-8?Q?Lawrence_Vel=C3=A1zquez?= , Zsh Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 9:10 AM, Ray Andrews wrote: > On 12/03/2014 08:43 AM, Roman Neuhauser wrote: > >> well, $'' is apparently different syntax from '', and it's dangerous to >> assume that two different syntaxes have the same semantics. > > *Another* gotcha yet again? No, this is the same gotcha as before, so to speak. That's dollar-single-single, not dollar-double. There is no special syntax for a double-quote preceded by a dollar. Roman just didn't put anything in between his quotes.