From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.0 required=5.0 tests=MAILING_LIST_MULTI, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 Received: (qmail 12292 invoked from network); 15 Jun 2020 05:10:13 -0000 Received: from ns1.primenet.com.au (HELO primenet.com.au) (203.24.36.2) by inbox.vuxu.org with ESMTPUTF8; 15 Jun 2020 05:10:13 -0000 Received: (qmail 5985 invoked by alias); 15 Jun 2020 05:09:59 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 24933 Received: (qmail 8870 invoked by uid 1010); 15 Jun 2020 05:09:59 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-oi1-f173.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.102.3/25842. spamassassin: 3.4.4. Clear:RC:0(209.85.167.173):SA:0(-1.9/5.0):. Processed in 1.739718 secs); 15 Jun 2020 05:09:59 -0000 X-Envelope-From: schaefer@brasslantern.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.167.173 as permitted sender) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mmoc7TBwZTe8lOV5pTBIXZwEVRZswexoCAGARzLPrLQ=; b=LCGdxaoxJniCVYYNX8jy+BA+jjIhnqTEW/xdJmJqFw6n0r9SE2zymBiIpSz4I7Umj+ tEQ1FRcpk9UGGo1mimnPUwU6uA3kFxYKYK/fClYiEGqZA9IiSQqZHZ8puOaGN/Qb5d13 hn2wLAQxveZpFFy56CmiNBFyJID+12vilJ2Rxy5Nr1x/aINVQzRj1YVHMzeyNPQsKtEL XVpRVPoY4SNgUEcaoDGUxN4bfBcI/D5dwJuHfuEjbhVhQyhyT8FJFCdMsON3UwxtN0lP YqNBhGSRfVDoSbb4TCSE+Ds9NHVCIXUjFOjd6qO1MoMNdYSMrygKhNW6kFfF1VYMdvS4 BbjQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5339ZxrJ8NSnO7QHTbPWuycDgwB1h0RwGd102pMbPFgRSigwbt/+ JVjx0EzJQ+vOO7LDb3omrgYkOJogI/NqoIV7K+FnWQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw8aevxNB42/dnpbpZQdrjA5GSBxWSwWFw9KfnW2Yr74ZnasctJuYYtl789THKNCh2HugBoTb5Q9nJzZKrwv0Q= X-Received: by 2002:aca:cf15:: with SMTP id f21mr7576451oig.173.1592197763432; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 22:09:23 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Bart Schaefer Date: Sun, 14 Jun 2020 22:09:12 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: menu-select doesn't respect COMPLETE_IN_WORD option To: Alan <8fvebtoeq87@gmail.com> Cc: Zsh Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Sun, Jun 14, 2020 at 5:37 PM Bart Schaefer wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 13, 2020 at 9:28 PM Alan <8fvebtoeq87@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > When I leave completeinword unset, _prefix completion simply doesn't work, even if I have: > > If I turn on "completeinword" then I can reproduce your described > behavior with menu-complete, although expand-or-complete-prefix still > works as expected. [...] > > So I still think you want to leave complete-in-word turned off and > find out what other part of your startup is breaking things when you > do. Ignore that last part, sorry. I just realized that when you wrote "_prefix completion simply doesn't work" you did not mean that completion failed, you just mean that it did something you didn't want it to, and that "something" is probably exactly what I described it doing. This documentation is in fact correct: "One gotcha with the _prefix completer: you have to make sure the option COMPLETE_IN_WORD is set."