Hi Daniel Shahaf,

Thank you very much for the explanation. In-Shah-Allah, from now on, I will
be able to refer to previous emails properly.

*Thanks and Best Regards,Ahmad Ismail*


On Sat, Sep 5, 2020 at 12:57 AM Daniel Shahaf <d.s@daniel.shahaf.name>
wrote:

> Ahmad Ismail wrote on Fri, 04 Sep 2020 22:27 +0600:
> > (You can find this question in the email subject "how to use tags in
> > zsh completion system".
>
> That's users/26032.
>
> > Sorry I do not know how to refer to another
> > email that is why I am writing like this. If possible then please
> > also let me know how to refer to another email).
>
> There are several ways, depending on circumstances.  I might refer to
> your email (the one I'm replying to) in any of the following forms:
>
> - "users/26049", using the mailing list manager software (MLM)'s message
>   number in the headers.  (The message number is a standard feature of
>   MLMs, but using it this way is uncommon outside of zsh land.)
>
> - "CAHAhJwJ6VDAQ3j-m7+3zSuuKNLanWO6WG8jE6dFzHeo01RNT0g@mail.gmail.com",
> the message-id.
>
> - The following message:
>
>     Date: Fri, 4 Sep 2020 22:27:30 +0600
>     From: Ahmad Ismail <ismail783@gmail.com>
>     To: Lewis Butler <lbutler@covisp.net>, d.s@daniel.shahaf.name
>     Cc: Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
>     Subject: Re: completely disable zsh completion system
>     Message-ID: <
> CAHAhJwJ6VDAQ3j-m7+3zSuuKNLanWO6WG8jE6dFzHeo01RNT0g@mail.gmail.com>
>     X-Seq: 26049
>
> - "https://zsh.org/users/26049", a permalink to the message.  (Usually
>   this points to the HTML archives.  Presently, however, those don't
>   get updated, so that link will give the raw message instead (until
>   message 26100 is received; the fallback codepath doesn't dynamically
>   extract individual messages from past tarballs).)
>
> The above are the most robust/portable/canonical ways to refer to
> a message.  It's worth noting that all of them can be resolved without
> network access (in contrast to links such as
> https://www.zsh.org/mla/users/2020/msg00420.html) and can also be
> easily resolved by anyone reading them in the archives, months or years
> later (in contrast to pointers such as, say, "Peter's email from last
> Monday").
>
> Cheers,
>
> Daniel
>