From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15994 invoked by alias); 7 Jan 2015 16:58:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 19695 Received: (qmail 10230 invoked from network); 7 Jan 2015 16:58:46 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SKRJH1YSe9sIhRdVHqvznGmGhHRphy3I9ekPltr3LN8=; b=vKsViX6juBWaNnhG8r1uzTh29lTVLz75s/2W1YTXKEK/kkuYBxMpS5ajUj+kfuYTaL 9VU8aKCfX1EC7dq4jQzVOqWs2R/rV+YFH9r6UcSyhBJV8r8mJ+59E/4fRKTT0ae+P2UX DH89A8Zo2mxapGNHa3+4HQylW48jXLF05mLrTe/Q5gmgEA4XTjkRQc8bFR8IGk06S0TQ DqWGnV9+VYC1dnfRgiBhGlPY7nKN7jqV9I8Oib3b+Fl0142Kwy0cb5HZdBc5fLW0Xe5v knye9i1KqZWb2KXH6aWklSYelUzkwud6xYrM9mMiLJ6douQhGlC8cR/9wJByjn1mzRmg 8F0A== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.50.109.164 with SMTP id ht4mr23242120igb.4.1420649920043; Wed, 07 Jan 2015 08:58:40 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20150107152856.0a347dec@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> References: <5488D414.6010300@eastlink.ca> <30453.1418258082@thecus.kiddle.eu> <5488F0AC.2040901@eastlink.ca> <141210214454.ZM12261@torch.brasslantern.com> <5489C8F4.8030703@eastlink.ca> <141211092824.ZM13349@torch.brasslantern.com> <5489F1BC.5000900@eastlink.ca> <20150107150109.GA14088@ypig.lip.ens-lyon.fr> <20150107152856.0a347dec@pwslap01u.europe.root.pri> Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2015 17:58:39 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: completion From: Mikael Magnusson To: Peter Stephenson Cc: Zsh Users Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 4:28 PM, Peter Stephenson wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2015 16:01:09 +0100 > Vincent Lefevre wrote: >> On 2014-12-11 11:34:20 -0800, Ray Andrews wrote: >> > Anyway, knowing that the star replaces the colons cracks it open. >> >> This is a bit old, but... When can an asterisk replace a colon? > > Colons aren't special to pattern matching at all. > >> If an asterisk can match anything, there may be an ambiguity on >> which field some given word will match. > > Yes, they are ambiguous. The examples probably could do with fixing. > > With some of the more complicated things you can do, this can actually > be hard to work around, I seem to remember. Does [^:]# work in this context? -- Mikael Magnusson