Expand array into multiple elements per item?

Expand array into multiple elements per item?

[Benjamin R. Haskell]

Three questions:

1. How can I easily take:

     somelist=( 'a b' c 'd e' )

and get back:

     anotherlist=( -id 'a b' -id c -id 'd e' )

2. ...relatedly, I'm confused by the following:

      $ somelist=( 'a b' c 'd e' )
      $ print -l - $somelist
      a b
      c
      d e
(i)  $ print -l - $^somelist(e:'reply=( -id $REPLY )':)
      zsh: no matches found: a b(e:reply=( -id $REPLY ):)
(ii) $ print -l - $^somelist(Ne:'reply=( -id $REPLY )':)
      (...nothing printed...)
      $

Why does neither (i) nor (ii) work?

3. I thought I recalled a relatively recent addition to parameter 
expansion flags for just this use-case.  But I can't seem to find the 
flag in zsh-4.3.12 patchlevel 1.5346.  Still interested in the answer to 
the rest, regardless.

-- 
Best,
Ben

Re: Expand array into multiple elements per item?

[Anthony Charles]

Hi,

You can try this :
 print -l -- "-id "$^somelist

anotherlist=( "-id "$^somelist )

But I can't give you any answer for question 2 :/

-- 
Anthony CHARLES

On Tue, Sep 13, 2011 at 04:15:50AM -0400, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
> Three questions:
> 
> 1. How can I easily take:
> 
>     somelist=( 'a b' c 'd e' )
> 
> and get back:
> 
>     anotherlist=( -id 'a b' -id c -id 'd e' )
> 
> 2. ...relatedly, I'm confused by the following:
> 
>      $ somelist=( 'a b' c 'd e' )
>      $ print -l - $somelist
>      a b
>      c
>      d e
> (i)  $ print -l - $^somelist(e:'reply=( -id $REPLY )':)
>      zsh: no matches found: a b(e:reply=( -id $REPLY ):)
> (ii) $ print -l - $^somelist(Ne:'reply=( -id $REPLY )':)
>      (...nothing printed...)
>      $
> 
> Why does neither (i) nor (ii) work?
> 
> 3. I thought I recalled a relatively recent addition to parameter
> expansion flags for just this use-case.  But I can't seem to find
> the flag in zsh-4.3.12 patchlevel 1.5346.  Still interested in the
> answer to the rest, regardless.
> 

Re: Expand array into multiple elements per item?

[Benjamin R. Haskell]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Anthony Charles wrote:

> Hi,
>
> You can try this :
> print -l -- "-id "$^somelist
>
> anotherlist=( "-id "$^somelist )
>
> But I can't give you any answer for question 2 :/

anotherlist should end up as I specified before:

     $ anotherlist=( -id 'a b' -id c -id 'd e' )

I.e. separate elements, but not just word-splitting everything:

     $ print -l - $^anotherlist
     -id     <-- separate
     a b     <-- kept as one argument
     -id     <-- separate
     c
     -id     <-- separate
     d e     <-- kept as one argument

With your suggestions the -id isn't a separate element:

     $ print -l - "-id "$^somelist
     -id a b
     -id c
     -id d e
     $ anotherlist=( "-id "$^somelist )
     $ print -l - $^anotherlist
     -id a b
     -id c
     -id d e

-- 
Best,
Ben

Re: Expand array into multiple elements per item?

[Oliver Kiddle]

On 13 Sep, "Benjamin R. Haskell" wrote:
> > You can try this :
> > print -l -- "-id "$^somelist
> 
> anotherlist should end up as I specified before:
> 
>      $ anotherlist=( -id 'a b' -id c -id 'd e' )
> 
> I.e. separate elements, but not just word-splitting everything:

If you join the list up and then re-split it, it might work:
  print -l -- ${(0)${(pj:\0:):--id$'\0'$a}}

Oliver

Re: Expand array into multiple elements per item?

[Peter Stephenson]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 04:15:50 -0400
"Benjamin R. Haskell" <zsh@benizi.com> wrote:

> Three questions:
> 
> 1. How can I easily take:
> 
>      somelist=( 'a b' c 'd e' )
> 
> and get back:
> 
>      anotherlist=( -id 'a b' -id c -id 'd e' )

anotherlist=({-id,${^somelist}})

> 2. ...relatedly, I'm confused by the following:
> 
>       $ somelist=( 'a b' c 'd e' )
>       $ print -l - $somelist
>       a b
>       c
>       d e
> (i)  $ print -l - $^somelist(e:'reply=( -id $REPLY )':)
>       zsh: no matches found: a b(e:reply=( -id $REPLY ):)
> (ii) $ print -l - $^somelist(Ne:'reply=( -id $REPLY )':)
>       (...nothing printed...)
>       $
> 
> Why does neither (i) nor (ii) work?

The main problem is that globbing flags rely on globbing; if there's no
matching file, it doesn't work.  You'd probably want "oN" in the
globbing flags to turn off sorting if you did have files.

> 3. I thought I recalled a relatively recent addition to parameter 
> expansion flags for just this use-case.  But I can't seem to find the 
> flag in zsh-4.3.12 patchlevel 1.5346.  Still interested in the answer to 
> the rest, regardless.

You might be thinking of the globbing flag, P.  If you did have files,
*(P:-id:) would have done what you wanted.  But you don't.  The actual
effect is a bit bizarre (turning off nomatch):

-id
a b(P:-id:)
-id
c(P:-id:)
-id
d e(P:-id:)

-- 
Peter Stephenson <pws@csr.com>            Software Engineer
Tel: +44 (0)1223 692070                   Cambridge Silicon Radio Limited
Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, UK


Member of the CSR plc group of companies. CSR plc registered in England and Wales, registered number 4187346, registered office Churchill House, Cambridge Business Park, Cowley Road, Cambridge, CB4 0WZ, United Kingdom
More information can be found at www.csr.com. Follow CSR on Twitter at http://twitter.com/CSR_PLC and read our blog at www.csr.com/blog

Re: Expand array into multiple elements per item?

[Mikael Magnusson]

On 13 September 2011 10:57, Peter Stephenson <Peter.Stephenson@csr.com> wrote:
>> Why does neither (i) nor (ii) work?
>
> The main problem is that globbing flags rely on globbing; if there's no
> matching file, it doesn't work.  You'd probably want "oN" in the
> globbing flags to turn off sorting if you did have files.
>
>> 3. I thought I recalled a relatively recent addition to parameter
>> expansion flags for just this use-case.  But I can't seem to find the
>> flag in zsh-4.3.12 patchlevel 1.5346.  Still interested in the answer to
>> the rest, regardless.
>
> You might be thinking of the globbing flag, P.  If you did have files,
> *(P:-id:) would have done what you wanted.  But you don't.  The actual
> effect is a bit bizarre (turning off nomatch):
>
> -id
> a b(P:-id:)
> -id
> c(P:-id:)
> -id
> d e(P:-id:)

One fun thing you can do is use .(e,'reply=(foo bar baz)',) if you
want to use some other globbing flags on your data. It's not
applicable for this problem, at least I can't think of a way. I did
suggest it on irc once for sorting an array by the basename:

22:39 <offbyone> I want to sort this by basename so that I order the
elements in this pair of expansions asciibetically regardless of the
directory they're found in.
22:39 <offbyone> (so, for example, if I had A/02_something
B/01_something B/03_something, it'd come out as B/01_something
A/02_something B/03_something)
22:47 <Mikachu> a=( oneglob anotherglob )
22:47 <Mikachu> echo .(e:'reply=($a)':oe,'REPLY=$REPLY:t',)

It would be nice to have a similar mechanism for sorting arrays maybe :).

Oh wait, I just realized it does work, just do this:

% print -l - .(e:'reply=($somelist)':P:-id:)
-id
a b
-id
c
-id
d e

Obviously, this does qualify in the 'a bit of a hack' category. (And
yes, it does fail if $PWD is chmoded -x, maybe / is a safer bet.)

-- 
Mikael Magnusson

Re: Expand array into multiple elements per item?

[Benjamin R. Haskell]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Mikael Magnusson wrote:

> On 13 September 2011 10:57, Peter Stephenson wrote:
>>> Why does neither (i) nor (ii) work?
>>
>> The main problem is that globbing flags rely on globbing; if there's 
>> no matching file, it doesn't work. [...]
>>
>
> One fun thing you can do is use .(e,'reply=(foo bar baz)',) if you 
> want to use some other globbing flags on your data. It's not 
> applicable for this problem, at least I can't think of a way. I did 
> suggest it on irc once for sorting an array by the basename:
>
> 22:39 <offbyone> I want to sort this by basename so that I order the 
> elements in this pair of expansions asciibetically regardless of the 
> directory they're found in.
> 22:39 <offbyone> (so, for example, if I had A/02_something 
> B/01_something B/03_something, it'd come out as B/01_something 
> A/02_something B/03_something)
> 22:47 <Mikachu> a=( oneglob anotherglob )
> 22:47 <Mikachu> echo .(e:'reply=($a)':oe,'REPLY=$REPLY:t',)
>
> It would be nice to have a similar mechanism for sorting arrays maybe :).

+1.


> Oh wait, I just realized it does work, just do this:
>
> % print -l - .(e:'reply=($somelist)':P:-id:)
> -id
> a b
> -id
> c
> -id
> d e
>
> Obviously, this does qualify in the 'a bit of a hack' category. (And 
> yes, it does fail if $PWD is chmoded -x, maybe / is a safer bet.)

Cool.  Nice hack.

-- 
Best,
Ben

Re: Expand array into multiple elements per item?

[Benjamin R. Haskell]

On Tue, 13 Sep 2011, Peter Stephenson wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 04:15:50 -0400 "Benjamin R. Haskell" wrote:
>
>> Three questions:
>>
>> 1. How can I easily take:
>>      somelist=( 'a b' c 'd e' )
>>
>> and get back:
>>
>>      anotherlist=( -id 'a b' -id c -id 'd e' )
>
> anotherlist=({-id,${^somelist}})

Elegant.  I didn't think about brace expansion.  Thanks, this is what 
I'll use.


>> 2. ...relatedly, I'm confused by the following:
>>
>>      $ somelist=( 'a b' c 'd e' )
>> (i)  $ print -l - $^somelist(e:'reply=( -id $REPLY )':)
>>      zsh: no matches found: a b(e:reply=( -id $REPLY ):)
>> (ii) $ print -l - $^somelist(Ne:'reply=( -id $REPLY )':)
>>      (...nothing printed...)
>>      $
>>
>> Why does neither (i) nor (ii) work?
>
> The main problem is that globbing flags rely on globbing; if there's 
> no matching file, it doesn't work.

I think it's just the fact that the glob is expanded (and thus tested 
for the resultant filenames existing) before the qualifiers that trips 
me up, but yes: Don't use globs on non-files.  Makes sense.


>> 3. I thought I recalled a relatively recent addition to parameter 
>> expansion flags for just this use-case.  But I can't seem to find the 
>> flag in zsh-4.3.12 patchlevel 1.5346.  Still interested in the answer 
>> to the rest, regardless.
>
> You might be thinking of the globbing flag, P.  If you did have files,
> *(P:-id:) would have done what you wanted.  But you don't.  The actual
> effect is a bit bizarre (turning off nomatch):
>
> -id
> a b(P:-id:)
> -id
> c(P:-id:)
> -id
> d e(P:-id:)

Interesting.  Yes.  'P' was the flag I failed to find.

-- 
Thanks,
Ben