From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-16351-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 6961 invoked by alias); 14 Sep 2011 17:36:33 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 16351
Received: (qmail 24107 invoked from network); 14 Sep 2011 17:36:31 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,
	T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL autolearn=ham version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.215.171 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=8tpeM5fP6bXCfCVBZlEEotjp14OhSW6tMJxUfDQzsME=;
        b=sWbf/3XCn/rA45nf5KjOTg6siNFwj8tKgp/JCR8zcji+iejYEWibda5mkbWhqsPqSF
         whBZrbHR2iG7+DCVbOVI8qI9pSoKeOz7SdoZk3elHuYqlujzYpJGhnnAWw6qk3w76UY6
         j+6OitHm2W3qNu6ozw/oGOUN5mNg5kQYLF0QE=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <20110914172148.GA7325@yahoo.fr>
References: <20110914172148.GA7325@yahoo.fr>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 19:36:23 +0200
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3RxCh-gYYZ-3G2jPh8U4E9Jyjx58rPKoxJ==AnYzD4w9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: {fd}< and compound commands
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: zsh-users@zsh.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On 14 September 2011 19:21, Stephane Chazelas
<stephane_chazelas@yahoo.fr> wrote:
> Hiya,
>
> $ echo $ZSH_VERSION
> 4.3.12
> $ zsh -c '{echo foo >&$fd;}  {fd}> a'
> zsh:1: parse error near `{'
> (same for while/do/done constructs at least)
>
> Is that the expected behavior? I can't see it being documented.
>
> That would be useful in
>
> while read <&$fd var; do
>  ...
> done {fd}< file
>
> to avoid having to worry about overriding fds 3-9.

Is this related to http://www.zsh.org/mla/workers/2011/msg01090.html
(and reply from pws)?

-- 
Mikael Magnusson