From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-19527-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 3535 invoked by alias); 14 Dec 2014 15:15:12 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 19527
Received: (qmail 10646 invoked from network); 14 Dec 2014 15:15:10 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        bh=ucCj/HFV8XQJe0vhDEjILejdTVkXplKibQh4BrteV2E=;
        b=BWIYXF/xpYjRySmV0GlBF/84PWCdW8I7AGhb0gxv97ELWOBuSYjgjcjZWjFrSiNeMd
         GXC+VMQzyqcDbkhXr4mmTsUS7GiP1bQ2HyJkq/QIfgihw5HhEihwmoI1rqPpGxC0yeTS
         f/GOGrS7164VGoQpOfD2TfgjnKkXuPXcyNTcQIlycD1iuXiq5uqBnd0WeSWi+pnvuKYC
         icuEhGv/RDJ4ptNHNezaA31nfBto8LS5QkiH+0zMsLfB/rdH/Bm6q6Mo20zfRtcEukm4
         p/xOiB2jSE4PS0IEyyrMREbf2gag8YJa+b9SDUclKXMpnYm8naq6S8mzZVaG2yNcFwLV
         h9qQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.42.25.144 with SMTP id a16mr24684995icc.66.1418570105432;
 Sun, 14 Dec 2014 07:15:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <20141214131541.GB1489@rikku>
References: <20141214131541.GB1489@rikku>
Date: Sun, 14 Dec 2014 16:15:05 +0100
Message-ID: <CAHYJk3T=_C8gCkt-wbX5XA++n2CXf90UyR9AV92ZEknW2dOF9A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: umount completion context and tags
From: Mikael Magnusson <mikachu@gmail.com>
To: Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 2:15 PM, Silas Silva <silasdb@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I was trying to tweak umount completion by using the tag-order style.
> AFAIK, umount completion.  According to "umount ^Xh", we have:
>
>     tags in context :completion::complete:umount::
>         argument-rest options  (_arguments _mount (eval))
>     tags in context :completion::complete:umount:argument-rest:
>         device-labels device-paths directories  (_alternative _mount (eval))
>         device-paths                            (_canonical_paths _canonical_paths _alternative _mount (eval))
>
> It means that we have at least three tags:
>
>     device-labels
>     device-paths
>     directories
>
> device-labels is useless for me, so I tried to exclude it:
>
>     zstyle ':completion:*:mount:*' tag-order '!device-labels'
>
> But, it simply doesn't work!  ^Xh still gives me all tags.  Taking a
> glance at the _mount completion, it has tags above hardcoded, but I
> didn't look further.
>
> In reality, what I want is to avoid behaviour like (in Linux):
>
>     mount /dev/sdb1 /mnt/usb0
>     cd /mnt
>     umount u<Tab>
>     umount udev  (!!!)
>
> Any help?
>
> Thank you!

That's weird in at least two ways. I get the style to work only if i
make it ":completion:*". Secondly, those are filesystem types, not
labels, and are only valid after -t afaik(?), and umount -t produces a
broken completion.

-- 
Mikael Magnusson