From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18544 invoked by alias); 8 Mar 2013 15:46:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: X-Seq: 17683 Received: (qmail 26313 invoked from network); 8 Mar 2013 15:45:58 -0000 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.2 (2011-06-06) on f.primenet.com.au X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED, DKIM_SIGNED,FREEMAIL_FROM,NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, T_DKIM_INVALID autolearn=no version=3.3.2 Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.216.50 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=UTn7afy7Ym/eRu3rDsZZpOt+ROdVpvSlZl9CTZfcytY=; b=wZZHCSNrHyBPuhKQahk6FKj+aAHtg1TWJeMLTEE8HzNk6y8Q1G0ylGUs2aKGG6l/kq PFLt5lpc/GVXFb+dv1PM5oS/xtjNFRjxpsCKhbIOcv/uOHWOfQIDvL0cpimbex7/o1e5 XDUppK24Di8moWTbrTAg6dX3ikOOGrN7AuELvdQDg1gh+QlGlqRHSPNcLf78HQnhBX+0 cYSX/gnPul+StVbrIrV7+MB1jF9rqMD/35nyqy/rbi5fjkgOIRMHGhOr6ermrSXLxodr 5uClLNRYcK1PqiK5rlUI9ByZMB9RuRjUmkf94YYJVkuW2igmtw6tUH43Lx4tImceD9Sp 6KgQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.224.78.196 with SMTP id m4mr4411403qak.67.1362757551253; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 07:45:51 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <13519.1362699509@thecus.kiddle.eu> References: <130307080445.ZM12249@torch.brasslantern.com> <13519.1362699509@thecus.kiddle.eu> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 10:45:51 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Slow completion From: joe M To: Oliver Kiddle Cc: zsh-users@zsh.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hello, I am wondering if there would be any benefit in compiling the completion functions such as _main_complete, etc. Will that show a performance boost? Thanks Joe]