From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <zsh-users-return-16448-mason-zsh=primenet.com.au@zsh.org>
Received: (qmail 15625 invoked by alias); 27 Sep 2011 14:26:10 -0000
Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
X-No-Archive: yes
List-Id: Zsh Users List <zsh-users.zsh.org>
List-Post: <mailto:zsh-users@zsh.org>
List-Help: <mailto:zsh-users-help@zsh.org>
X-Seq: 16448
Received: (qmail 21806 invoked from network); 27 Sep 2011 14:26:07 -0000
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.3.1 (2010-03-16) on f.primenet.com.au
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,
	DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW autolearn=ham
	version=3.3.1
Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _spf.google.com designates 209.85.210.171 as permitted sender)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=namtrac.org; s=www;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :content-type;
        bh=t61EcuyVoVmbD+6J1VmFXq/o1Kv3HSr2j3f8Ix4mP/k=;
        b=GkVWCfZNcWUGYqMtf98bT+tHcDo7WIqcTkBnqmMJ6EJU2or7CqS2uzWLZNsBRYMeSD
         lgAfb/cgm+P+uLwLo/2uXB4szhPA+3qv7C6AE1+8FGPH11vfMisvtd0t8Elx+wz9EQic
         x16FfpyWwKJ4Z4K3WKnguj6BiLJOF5aSxHGgU=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <110927072015.ZM25125@torch.brasslantern.com>
References: <CAJR5sYhgXzUiGn_BGHiULrqH_VZtxhNFFBVEc=F-tq5D+OZ74g@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAHYJk3RMadRdRKGLzhMEk1b1LhJzEuAjUdNnor2gpfNVGgf52A@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAJR5sYiP00oUMEBmKgV_76oiUD6BFNzxgGKpTgNvHwBjQQWy6g@mail.gmail.com> <110927072015.ZM25125@torch.brasslantern.com>
From: =?UTF-8?B?xLBzbWFpbCBEw7ZubWV6?= <ismail@namtrac.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:25:44 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJR5sYhmtWXO_gCKBB7qcs9mHQL6sZUH_biuPqGhADbEgcL9bQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Interesting zsh behaviour regarding awk and backslash
To: Zsh Users <zsh-users@zsh.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151773e0da359cb404aded0e2b

--00151773e0da359cb404aded0e2b
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hi;

On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Bart Schaefer <schaefer@brasslantern.com>wrote:

> On Sep 27,  3:54pm, Ismail Donmez wrote:
> }
> } Thanks that works,  any reason this is not on by default for sh
> } compatibility though?
>
> Because zsh is quite deliberately not sh compatible by default?
>

Well ok, this was from a script which explicitly stated /bin/sh so this is a
non-issue for me, just wondered.

Regards,
ismail

--00151773e0da359cb404aded0e2b--