From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on inbox.vuxu.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.1 required=5.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 Received: from primenet.com.au (ns1.primenet.com.au [203.24.36.2]) by inbox.vuxu.org (OpenSMTPD) with ESMTP id 9227032c for ; Fri, 6 Sep 2019 13:21:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 25780 invoked by alias); 6 Sep 2019 13:21:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact zsh-users-help@zsh.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk X-No-Archive: yes List-Id: Zsh Users List List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: X-Seq: 24215 Received: (qmail 6217 invoked by uid 1010); 6 Sep 2019 13:21:02 -0000 X-Qmail-Scanner-Diagnostics: from mail-vs1-f44.google.com by f.primenet.com.au (envelope-from , uid 7791) with qmail-scanner-2.11 (clamdscan: 0.101.2/25559. spamassassin: 3.4.2. Clear:RC:0(209.85.217.44):SA:0(-2.0/5.0):. Processed in 1.49629 secs); 06 Sep 2019 13:21:02 -0000 X-Envelope-From: sgniazdowski@gmail.com X-Qmail-Scanner-Mime-Attachments: | X-Qmail-Scanner-Zip-Files: | Received-SPF: pass (ns1.primenet.com.au: SPF record at _netblocks.google.com designates 209.85.217.44 as permitted sender) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=BJNzm8tTRTOpsY7XhnZ630z9gslPqkMUN0WQjO3gHB0=; b=vhf9XeCeQqu/Ds1HBM4YAW+CkWx7MH5GDCz1MEvnHRiAHFm/xBneuubOyXPgxR9576 8S+6iLt0F695+eJznGe2/lONz14cgNMBoafQyo502wZbBAZDJejTAXLHDz5VKm5mX5Da pAncqUM3NmubgusIE3Wt5KmlSTWddzhxpH6gnnD22CkLRVa4m7zLOx0lM9hZRzRB702b B2EmFlQxnXJxdkUq/dAiutyhZpDyI9Y5MWQFHZCMOjzpLtOAW7XzEpdflrW65xEaWwnO 3H/92QuFHDG11ORk88tR4z4XLRbzs4+L0QT53/FfMwUferXLhnfoyNaIiLxJBZMFBCLb T2IQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=BJNzm8tTRTOpsY7XhnZ630z9gslPqkMUN0WQjO3gHB0=; b=ePQ/VcIlAZtK1RQMOEZLARPelasLBhaYrvLPS/cF9TbrdLT8kNWr10wk8IK3RVk+e7 gofnX6J2XLkeLejK29xhQiuMt1ya1ixnql9ILi+yvBscNddB6xTGy/zLVjD3Toeqi70J KJn7AwsVY2doq8/Rq2/Ix3h+fUDAt0svDleX4UHoEEBvfmMy+gltfrTIHrw+uG7BnwrA EHhJTP0G1pYu/wtd8iy79a6ICEAI4y0gp3CJn9CTJnz4Ge+GMsEicWGLt6ih97A7g49K Z6R3SLM0i52odRL40hpsVPOfkCbGxrKfAxhmSvxf3fpJPah758fdEZHima5/btpCoyxZ wHsw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVOyEpCv7zi+mcWUAsb7K9WFnqqOIpFKiWIW4X/JnVGnPOz1AM4 1o7QQSCzBy+1YF9UxI44nh9Ec5LdcWIkg+c4YlCaAxK2 X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqyYTqShB1sWM6ac2/quT01EsY63tSfaviN72CC7tvY4MLLKRjPW+HW+6F1xRzUDt5vCUzDnrFevawfXwrZsr6w= X-Received: by 2002:a67:f418:: with SMTP id p24mr4772699vsn.215.1567776027893; Fri, 06 Sep 2019 06:20:27 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: Sebastian Gniazdowski Date: Fri, 6 Sep 2019 15:19:46 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: slow startup of zsh (1x slower than bash) To: Roman Perepelitsa Cc: Peng Yu , julien.nicoulaud@gmail.com, zsh-users Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" On Fri, 6 Sep 2019 at 15:11, Roman Perepelitsa wrote: > > But because zsh is much slower than bash... > > This isn't a fair summary of your benchmark. It would be more accurate > to say that zsh on some systems may take up to twice as long as bash > to execute an empty script. Even this is too strong said. I would say: "zsh startups 5-7 ms longer than bash". -- Sebastian Gniazdowski News: https://twitter.com/ZdharmaI IRC: https://kiwiirc.com/client/chat.freenode.net:+6697/#zplugin Blog: http://zdharma.org